TY - JOUR
T1 - Emotional Expression and the Reduction of Motivated Cognitive Bias
T2 - Evidence From Cognitive Dissonance and Distancing From Victims' Paradigms
AU - Pyszczynski, Tom
AU - Greenberg, Jeff
AU - Solomon, Sheldon
AU - Sideris, John
AU - Stubing, Mari Jo
PY - 1993/2
Y1 - 1993/2
N2 - Two experiments tested whether expression of emotions from which motivated cognitive biases presumably provide protection would reduce the extent of such biases. In Study 1, we hypothesized that expressing any tension produced by writing a counterattitudinal essay would reduce the extent of dissonance-reducing attitude change. To test this hypothesis, Ss were induced to write an essay arguing for higher tuition. High-choice Ss were either encouraged to express their emotions, to suppress them, or to do neither. As expected, high-choice-express Ss exhibited the least attitude change. Study 2 tested the hypothesis that expressing fear of cancer would reduce the extent of defensive distancing from cancer patients, but expressing sympathy would not. Although control Ss clearly distanced from cancer patients, fear-expression Ss did not. Implications for understanding the role of affect in defense are discussed.
AB - Two experiments tested whether expression of emotions from which motivated cognitive biases presumably provide protection would reduce the extent of such biases. In Study 1, we hypothesized that expressing any tension produced by writing a counterattitudinal essay would reduce the extent of dissonance-reducing attitude change. To test this hypothesis, Ss were induced to write an essay arguing for higher tuition. High-choice Ss were either encouraged to express their emotions, to suppress them, or to do neither. As expected, high-choice-express Ss exhibited the least attitude change. Study 2 tested the hypothesis that expressing fear of cancer would reduce the extent of defensive distancing from cancer patients, but expressing sympathy would not. Although control Ss clearly distanced from cancer patients, fear-expression Ss did not. Implications for understanding the role of affect in defense are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027551163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027551163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.177
DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.177
M3 - Article
C2 - 8433271
AN - SCOPUS:0027551163
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 64
SP - 177
EP - 186
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
IS - 2
ER -