TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrical impedance vs. light transmission aggregometry
T2 - Testing platelet reactivity to antiplatelet drugs using the MICELI POC impedance aggregometer as compared to a commercial predecessor
AU - Mencarini, Tatiana
AU - Roka-Moiia, Yana
AU - Bozzi, Silvia
AU - Redaelli, Alberto
AU - Slepian, Marvin J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by NHLBI ( R41 HL147807-01A1 to Marvin J. Slepian), Arizona Center for Accelerated Biomedical Innovation of the University of Arizona (Yana Roka-Moiia, Tatiana Mencarini, and Marvin J. Slepian), and National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (E-Team Stage1 & 2 Grants to Yana Roka-Moiia and Marvin J. Slepian).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Background: Patients' responses to antiplatelet therapy significantly vary, with individuals showing high residual platelet reactivity associated with thrombosis. To personalize thrombosis management, platelet function testing has been suggested as a promising tool able to monitor the antithrombotic effect of antiplatelet agents in real-time. We have prototyped the MICELI, a miniature and easy-to-use electrical impedance aggregometer (EIA), measuring platelet aggregation in whole blood. Here, we tested the capability of the MICELI aggregometer to quantify platelet reactivity on antiplatelet agents, as compared with conventional light-transmission aggregometry (LTA). Methods: Platelet aggregation in ACD-anticoagulated whole blood and platelet-rich plasma of healthy donors (n = 30) was evaluated. The effect of clopidogrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, cilostazol, and tirofiban on ADP-induced aggregation was tested, while aspirin was evaluated with arachidonic acid and collagen. Platelet aggregation was recorded using the MICELI or BioData PAP-8E (Bio/Data Corp.) aggregometers. Results: The MICELI aggregometer detected an adequate and comparable dose-dependent decrease of platelet aggregation in response to increments of drugs' concentrations, as compared to LTA (the inter-device R2 = 0.79–0.93). Platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma recorded by LTA showed higher sensitivity to antiplatelet agents, but it couldn't distinguish between different drug doses as indicated by saturation of the aggregatory response. Conclusion: Platelet aggregation in whole blood as recorded by EIA represents a better model system for evaluation of platelet reactivity as compared with platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma as recorded by LTA, since EIA takes into consideration the modulatory effect of other blood cells on platelet hemostatic function and pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet drugs in vivo. As such, the MICELI impedance aggregometer could be potentially employed for the point-of-care monitoring of platelet function in patients on-treatment for personalized tailoring of their antiplatelet regimen.
AB - Background: Patients' responses to antiplatelet therapy significantly vary, with individuals showing high residual platelet reactivity associated with thrombosis. To personalize thrombosis management, platelet function testing has been suggested as a promising tool able to monitor the antithrombotic effect of antiplatelet agents in real-time. We have prototyped the MICELI, a miniature and easy-to-use electrical impedance aggregometer (EIA), measuring platelet aggregation in whole blood. Here, we tested the capability of the MICELI aggregometer to quantify platelet reactivity on antiplatelet agents, as compared with conventional light-transmission aggregometry (LTA). Methods: Platelet aggregation in ACD-anticoagulated whole blood and platelet-rich plasma of healthy donors (n = 30) was evaluated. The effect of clopidogrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, cilostazol, and tirofiban on ADP-induced aggregation was tested, while aspirin was evaluated with arachidonic acid and collagen. Platelet aggregation was recorded using the MICELI or BioData PAP-8E (Bio/Data Corp.) aggregometers. Results: The MICELI aggregometer detected an adequate and comparable dose-dependent decrease of platelet aggregation in response to increments of drugs' concentrations, as compared to LTA (the inter-device R2 = 0.79–0.93). Platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma recorded by LTA showed higher sensitivity to antiplatelet agents, but it couldn't distinguish between different drug doses as indicated by saturation of the aggregatory response. Conclusion: Platelet aggregation in whole blood as recorded by EIA represents a better model system for evaluation of platelet reactivity as compared with platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma as recorded by LTA, since EIA takes into consideration the modulatory effect of other blood cells on platelet hemostatic function and pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet drugs in vivo. As such, the MICELI impedance aggregometer could be potentially employed for the point-of-care monitoring of platelet function in patients on-treatment for personalized tailoring of their antiplatelet regimen.
KW - Antiplatelet therapy
KW - Aspirin resistance
KW - Clopidogrel resistance
KW - Electrical impedance aggregometry
KW - Light transmission aggregometry
KW - Point-of-care diagnostic device
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108086575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108086575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.05.021
DO - 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.05.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 34147831
AN - SCOPUS:85108086575
SN - 0049-3848
VL - 204
SP - 66
EP - 75
JO - Thrombosis Research
JF - Thrombosis Research
ER -