TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate for established status epilepticus by age group (ESETT)
T2 - a double-blind, responsive-adaptive, randomised controlled trial
AU - Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials
AU - Chamberlain, James M.
AU - Kapur, Jaideep
AU - Shinnar, Shlomo
AU - Elm, Jordan
AU - Holsti, Maija
AU - Babcock, Lynn
AU - Rogers, Alex
AU - Barsan, William
AU - Cloyd, James
AU - Lowenstein, Daniel
AU - Bleck, Thomas P.
AU - Conwit, Robin
AU - Meinzer, Caitlyn
AU - Cock, Hannah
AU - Fountain, Nathan B.
AU - Underwood, Ellen
AU - Connor, Jason T.
AU - Silbergleit, Robert
AU - Gray, Emily
AU - Gunter, Sonya
AU - Fansler, Amy
AU - Stevenson, Valerie
AU - Bengelink, Erin
AU - Harney, Deneil
AU - Speers, Mickie
AU - Black, Joy
AU - Fisher, Natalie
AU - Harsh, Donna
AU - Ramakrishnan, Arthi
AU - Harris, Lindsey
AU - Bozeman, Nia
AU - Spiteri, Aimee
AU - Palesch, Yuko
AU - Tillman, Holly
AU - Zhao, Wenle
AU - Pauls, Qi
AU - Arnaud, Chris
AU - Dillon, Catherine R.
AU - Riley, Jodie
AU - Alford, Teldon
AU - Conner, Cassidy
AU - Coles, Lisa
AU - Sathe, Abhi
AU - Janis, Scott
AU - Hartman, Adam
AU - Fureman, Brandy
AU - Trinka, Eugen
AU - Treiman, David
AU - Wright, David
AU - Denninghoff, Kurt
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/4/11
Y1 - 2020/4/11
N2 - Background: Benzodiazepine-refractory, or established, status epilepticus is thought to be of similar pathophysiology in children and adults, but differences in underlying aetiology and pharmacodynamics might differentially affect response to therapy. In the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT) we compared the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate in established status epilepticus, and here we describe our results after extending enrolment in children to compare outcomes in three age groups. Methods: In this multicentre, double-blind, response-adaptive, randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients from 58 hospital emergency departments across the USA. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 2 years or older, had been treated for a generalised convulsive seizure of longer than 5 min duration with adequate doses of benzodiazepines, and continued to have persistent or recurrent convulsions in the emergency department for at least 5 min and no more than 30 min after the last dose of benzodiazepine. Patients were randomly assigned in a response-adaptive manner, using Bayesian methods and stratified by age group (<18 years, 18–65 years, and >65 years), to levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, or valproate. All patients, investigators, study staff, and pharmacists were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was absence of clinically apparent seizures with improved consciousness and without additional antiseizure medication at 1 h from start of drug infusion. The primary safety outcome was life-threatening hypotension or cardiac arrhythmia. The efficacy and safety outcomes were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01960075. Findings: Between Nov 3, 2015, and Dec 29, 2018, we enrolled 478 patients and 462 unique patients were included: 225 children (aged <18 years), 186 adults (18–65 years), and 51 older adults (>65 years). 175 (38%) patients were randomly assigned to levetiracetam, 142 (31%) to fosphenyltoin, and 145 (31%) were to valproate. Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatments within age groups. The primary efficacy outcome was met in those treated with levetiracetam for 52% (95% credible interval 41–62) of children, 44% (33–55) of adults, and 37% (19–59) of older adults; with fosphenytoin in 49% (38–61) of children, 46% (34–59) of adults, and 35% (17–59) of older adults; and with valproate in 52% (41–63) of children, 46% (34–58) of adults, and 47% (25–70) of older adults. No differences were detected in efficacy or primary safety outcome by drug within each age group. With the exception of endotracheal intubation in children, secondary safety outcomes did not significantly differ by drug within each age group. Interpretation: Children, adults, and older adults with established status epilepticus respond similarly to levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate, with treatment success in approximately half of patients. Any of the three drugs can be considered as a potential first-choice, second-line drug for benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus. Funding: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health.
AB - Background: Benzodiazepine-refractory, or established, status epilepticus is thought to be of similar pathophysiology in children and adults, but differences in underlying aetiology and pharmacodynamics might differentially affect response to therapy. In the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT) we compared the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate in established status epilepticus, and here we describe our results after extending enrolment in children to compare outcomes in three age groups. Methods: In this multicentre, double-blind, response-adaptive, randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients from 58 hospital emergency departments across the USA. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 2 years or older, had been treated for a generalised convulsive seizure of longer than 5 min duration with adequate doses of benzodiazepines, and continued to have persistent or recurrent convulsions in the emergency department for at least 5 min and no more than 30 min after the last dose of benzodiazepine. Patients were randomly assigned in a response-adaptive manner, using Bayesian methods and stratified by age group (<18 years, 18–65 years, and >65 years), to levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, or valproate. All patients, investigators, study staff, and pharmacists were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was absence of clinically apparent seizures with improved consciousness and without additional antiseizure medication at 1 h from start of drug infusion. The primary safety outcome was life-threatening hypotension or cardiac arrhythmia. The efficacy and safety outcomes were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01960075. Findings: Between Nov 3, 2015, and Dec 29, 2018, we enrolled 478 patients and 462 unique patients were included: 225 children (aged <18 years), 186 adults (18–65 years), and 51 older adults (>65 years). 175 (38%) patients were randomly assigned to levetiracetam, 142 (31%) to fosphenyltoin, and 145 (31%) were to valproate. Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatments within age groups. The primary efficacy outcome was met in those treated with levetiracetam for 52% (95% credible interval 41–62) of children, 44% (33–55) of adults, and 37% (19–59) of older adults; with fosphenytoin in 49% (38–61) of children, 46% (34–59) of adults, and 35% (17–59) of older adults; and with valproate in 52% (41–63) of children, 46% (34–58) of adults, and 47% (25–70) of older adults. No differences were detected in efficacy or primary safety outcome by drug within each age group. With the exception of endotracheal intubation in children, secondary safety outcomes did not significantly differ by drug within each age group. Interpretation: Children, adults, and older adults with established status epilepticus respond similarly to levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate, with treatment success in approximately half of patients. Any of the three drugs can be considered as a potential first-choice, second-line drug for benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus. Funding: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082647137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082647137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30611-5
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30611-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 32203691
AN - SCOPUS:85082647137
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 395
SP - 1217
EP - 1224
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10231
ER -