TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of post-reading word-focused activities on L2 learners’ reading behavior and vocabulary learning
T2 - an eye-tracking study
AU - Kang, Hyeonah
AU - Nicol, Janet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Association for Language Learning.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - While there is ample evidence that engaging in word-focused activities after reading facilitates vocabulary learning, the mechanisms underlying this remain unclear. Does engaging in a post-reading word-focused activity influence the processing of target vocabulary in a subsequent reading round, thereby promoting vocabulary development? Using an eye-tracker, we recorded L2 learners’ eye movements as they read an English narrative containing 16 target non-words before and after engaging with one of three activities: (a) Comprehension-test (control), (b) Fill-in-the-blank activity, and (c) Summary-writing. Subsequently, participants received a vocabulary test. The results showed that interacting with target non-words via the Fill-in-the-blank activity or Summary-writing led to better vocabulary learning than taking a Comprehension-test. Moreover, the Summary group showed a significant relationship between (a) differences in reading times for target non-words during the initial and re-reading tasks and (b) their vocabulary test accuracy. In contrast, no such relationship was observed for the Fill-in-the-blank activity group. This suggests that post-reading activities influenced how target items were processed and remembered. Further analysis revealed that items that were not recalled during the post-reading activity but later remembered in the vocabulary test showed similar processing times between readings, an effect primarily seen in the Fill-in-the-blank activity.
AB - While there is ample evidence that engaging in word-focused activities after reading facilitates vocabulary learning, the mechanisms underlying this remain unclear. Does engaging in a post-reading word-focused activity influence the processing of target vocabulary in a subsequent reading round, thereby promoting vocabulary development? Using an eye-tracker, we recorded L2 learners’ eye movements as they read an English narrative containing 16 target non-words before and after engaging with one of three activities: (a) Comprehension-test (control), (b) Fill-in-the-blank activity, and (c) Summary-writing. Subsequently, participants received a vocabulary test. The results showed that interacting with target non-words via the Fill-in-the-blank activity or Summary-writing led to better vocabulary learning than taking a Comprehension-test. Moreover, the Summary group showed a significant relationship between (a) differences in reading times for target non-words during the initial and re-reading tasks and (b) their vocabulary test accuracy. In contrast, no such relationship was observed for the Fill-in-the-blank activity group. This suggests that post-reading activities influenced how target items were processed and remembered. Further analysis revealed that items that were not recalled during the post-reading activity but later remembered in the vocabulary test showed similar processing times between readings, an effect primarily seen in the Fill-in-the-blank activity.
KW - L2 vocabulary learning
KW - eye-tracking
KW - post-reading activities
KW - reading behavior
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007045878
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105007045878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09571736.2025.2502729
DO - 10.1080/09571736.2025.2502729
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105007045878
SN - 0957-1736
JO - Language Learning Journal
JF - Language Learning Journal
ER -