TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior
AU - Whiting, Steven W.
AU - Maynes, Timothy D.
AU - Podsakoff, Nathan P.
AU - Podsakoff, Philip M.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Although employee voice behavior is expected to have important organizational benefits, research indicates that employees voicing their recommendations for organizational change may be evaluated either positively or negatively by observers. A review of the literature suggests that the perceived efficacy of voice behaviors may be a function of characteristics associated with the (a) source, (b) message, and (c) context of the voice event. In this study, we manipulated variables from each of these categories based on a model designed to predict when voice will positively or negatively impact raters' evaluations of an employee's performance. To test our model, we conducted 3 laboratory studies in which we manipulated 2 source factors (voicer expertise and trustworthiness), 2 message factors (recommending a solution and positively vs. negatively framing the message), and 2 context factors (timing of the voice event and organizational norms for speaking up vs. keeping quiet). We also examined the mediating effects of liking, prosocial motives, and perceptions that the voice behavior was constructive on the relationships between the source, message, and context factors and performance evaluations. Generally speaking, we found that at least one of the variables from each category had an effect on performance evaluations for the voicer and that most of these effects were indirect, operating through one or more of the mediators. Implications for theory and future research are discussed.
AB - Although employee voice behavior is expected to have important organizational benefits, research indicates that employees voicing their recommendations for organizational change may be evaluated either positively or negatively by observers. A review of the literature suggests that the perceived efficacy of voice behaviors may be a function of characteristics associated with the (a) source, (b) message, and (c) context of the voice event. In this study, we manipulated variables from each of these categories based on a model designed to predict when voice will positively or negatively impact raters' evaluations of an employee's performance. To test our model, we conducted 3 laboratory studies in which we manipulated 2 source factors (voicer expertise and trustworthiness), 2 message factors (recommending a solution and positively vs. negatively framing the message), and 2 context factors (timing of the voice event and organizational norms for speaking up vs. keeping quiet). We also examined the mediating effects of liking, prosocial motives, and perceptions that the voice behavior was constructive on the relationships between the source, message, and context factors and performance evaluations. Generally speaking, we found that at least one of the variables from each category had an effect on performance evaluations for the voicer and that most of these effects were indirect, operating through one or more of the mediators. Implications for theory and future research are discussed.
KW - Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behavior
KW - Employee voice behavior
KW - Liking
KW - Performance evaluations
KW - Trustworthiness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873022323&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873022323&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/a0024871
DO - 10.1037/a0024871
M3 - Article
C2 - 21842973
AN - SCOPUS:84873022323
SN - 0021-9010
VL - 97
SP - 159
EP - 182
JO - Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Psychology
IS - 1
ER -