TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Estrogen Plus Progestin on Gynecologic Cancers and Associated Diagnostic Procedures
T2 - The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial
AU - Anderson, Garnet L.
AU - Judd, Howard L.
AU - Kaunitz, Andrew M.
AU - Barad, David H.
AU - Beresford, Shirley A.A.
AU - Pettinger, Mary
AU - Liu, James
AU - McNeeley, S. Gene
AU - Lopez, Ana Maria
PY - 2003/10/1
Y1 - 2003/10/1
N2 - Context: The effects of continuous combined hormone therapy on gynecologic cancers have not been investigated previously in a randomized trial setting. Objective: To determine the possible associations of estrogen plus progestin on gynecologic cancers and related diagnostic procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 16608 postmenopausal women, who had not had a hysterectomy at baseline and who had been recruited from 40 US clinical centers between September 1993 and October 1998 (average follow-up, 5.6 years). Intervention: One tablet per day containing 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (n = 8506) or placebo (n = 8102). Main Outcome Measure: Incident invasive cancer of the ovary and endometrium. Results: In 5.6 years of follow-up, there were 32 cases of invasive ovarian cancer, 58 cases of endometrial cancer, 1 case of nonendometrial uterine cancer, 13 cases of cervical cancer, and 7 cases of other gynecologic cancers. The hazard ratio (HR) for invasive ovarian cancer in women assigned to estrogen plus progestin compared with placebo was 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-3.24). The HR for endometrial cancer was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.48-1.36). No appreciable differences were found in the distributions of tumor histology, stage, or grade for either cancer site. The incidence of other gynecologic cancers was low and did not differ by randomization assignment. More women taking estrogen plus progestin required endometrial biopsies (33% vs 6%; P<.001). Conclusions: This randomized trial suggests that continuous combined estrogen plus progestin therapy may increase the risk of ovarian cancer while producing endometrial cancer rates similar to placebo. The increased burden of endometrial biopsies required to assess vaginal bleeding further limits the acceptability of this regimen. These data provide additional support for caution in the use of continuous combined hormones.
AB - Context: The effects of continuous combined hormone therapy on gynecologic cancers have not been investigated previously in a randomized trial setting. Objective: To determine the possible associations of estrogen plus progestin on gynecologic cancers and related diagnostic procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 16608 postmenopausal women, who had not had a hysterectomy at baseline and who had been recruited from 40 US clinical centers between September 1993 and October 1998 (average follow-up, 5.6 years). Intervention: One tablet per day containing 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (n = 8506) or placebo (n = 8102). Main Outcome Measure: Incident invasive cancer of the ovary and endometrium. Results: In 5.6 years of follow-up, there were 32 cases of invasive ovarian cancer, 58 cases of endometrial cancer, 1 case of nonendometrial uterine cancer, 13 cases of cervical cancer, and 7 cases of other gynecologic cancers. The hazard ratio (HR) for invasive ovarian cancer in women assigned to estrogen plus progestin compared with placebo was 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-3.24). The HR for endometrial cancer was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.48-1.36). No appreciable differences were found in the distributions of tumor histology, stage, or grade for either cancer site. The incidence of other gynecologic cancers was low and did not differ by randomization assignment. More women taking estrogen plus progestin required endometrial biopsies (33% vs 6%; P<.001). Conclusions: This randomized trial suggests that continuous combined estrogen plus progestin therapy may increase the risk of ovarian cancer while producing endometrial cancer rates similar to placebo. The increased burden of endometrial biopsies required to assess vaginal bleeding further limits the acceptability of this regimen. These data provide additional support for caution in the use of continuous combined hormones.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141593565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141593565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.290.13.1739
DO - 10.1001/jama.290.13.1739
M3 - Article
C2 - 14519708
AN - SCOPUS:0141593565
SN - 0098-7484
VL - 290
SP - 1739
EP - 1748
JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
IS - 13
ER -