EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUP BRAINSTORMING IN ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING.

Andrew C. Lewis; Thomas L. Sadosky; Terry Connolly

doi:10.1109/TEM.1975.6447219

EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUP BRAINSTORMING IN ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING.

Andrew C. Lewis, Thomas L. Sadosky, Terry Connolly

Management and Organizations

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

A number of claims have been made for the effectiveness of group brainstorming as a means of enhancing creativity in problem solving groups, and the technique has been quite widely used for this purpose. There is, however, little solid evidence for the superiority of group to pooled individual brainstorming. This paper reviews the available evidence, and reports three new experiments evaluating group brainstorming for engineering problems, using executives as well as student subjects, group sizes of 2, 4, and 6, time periods of 50 and 90 minutes, and mixtures of group and individual work. The findings extend and support the previous evidence of the ineffectiveness of group brainstorming for engineering problems. The pooling of individual brainstorming efforts appears to be the preferred procedure. 22 refs.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	119-124
Number of pages	6
Journal	IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Volume	EM-22
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1975.6447219
State	Published - 1975

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Strategy and Management
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1109/TEM.1975.6447219

Cite this

@article{9760dddb09114096ad7d5dbe8f69bcef,

title = "EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUP BRAINSTORMING IN ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING.",

abstract = "A number of claims have been made for the effectiveness of group brainstorming as a means of enhancing creativity in problem solving groups, and the technique has been quite widely used for this purpose. There is, however, little solid evidence for the superiority of group to pooled individual brainstorming. This paper reviews the available evidence, and reports three new experiments evaluating group brainstorming for engineering problems, using executives as well as student subjects, group sizes of 2, 4, and 6, time periods of 50 and 90 minutes, and mixtures of group and individual work. The findings extend and support the previous evidence of the ineffectiveness of group brainstorming for engineering problems. The pooling of individual brainstorming efforts appears to be the preferred procedure. 22 refs.",

author = "Lewis, {Andrew C.} and Sadosky, {Thomas L.} and Terry Connolly",

year = "1975",

doi = "10.1109/TEM.1975.6447219",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "EM-22",

pages = "119--124",

journal = "IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management",

issn = "0018-9391",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUP BRAINSTORMING IN ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING.

AU - Lewis, Andrew C.

AU - Sadosky, Thomas L.

AU - Connolly, Terry

PY - 1975

Y1 - 1975

N2 - A number of claims have been made for the effectiveness of group brainstorming as a means of enhancing creativity in problem solving groups, and the technique has been quite widely used for this purpose. There is, however, little solid evidence for the superiority of group to pooled individual brainstorming. This paper reviews the available evidence, and reports three new experiments evaluating group brainstorming for engineering problems, using executives as well as student subjects, group sizes of 2, 4, and 6, time periods of 50 and 90 minutes, and mixtures of group and individual work. The findings extend and support the previous evidence of the ineffectiveness of group brainstorming for engineering problems. The pooling of individual brainstorming efforts appears to be the preferred procedure. 22 refs.

AB - A number of claims have been made for the effectiveness of group brainstorming as a means of enhancing creativity in problem solving groups, and the technique has been quite widely used for this purpose. There is, however, little solid evidence for the superiority of group to pooled individual brainstorming. This paper reviews the available evidence, and reports three new experiments evaluating group brainstorming for engineering problems, using executives as well as student subjects, group sizes of 2, 4, and 6, time periods of 50 and 90 minutes, and mixtures of group and individual work. The findings extend and support the previous evidence of the ineffectiveness of group brainstorming for engineering problems. The pooling of individual brainstorming efforts appears to be the preferred procedure. 22 refs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016543586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016543586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TEM.1975.6447219

DO - 10.1109/TEM.1975.6447219

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0016543586

SN - 0018-9391

VL - EM-22

SP - 119

EP - 124

JO - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

JF - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

IS - 3

ER -

EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUP BRAINSTORMING IN ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING.

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this