Effect of Endo-GIA vascular staple size on laparoscopic vessel sealing in a porcine model

A. El-Hakim; Y. Cai; R. Marcovich; P. Pinto; B. R. Lee

doi:10.1007/s00464-003-8546-6

Effect of Endo-GIA vascular staple size on laparoscopic vessel sealing in a porcine model

A. El-Hakim, Y. Cai, R. Marcovich, P. Pinto, B. R. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Two sizes of endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis (Endo-GIA) staples are currently available for vascular control. The purpose of this study was to compare the Endo-GIA 30-2.0 mm with the Endo-GIA 30-2.5 mm vascular staple. Methods: The renal blood vessels, aorta, and vena cava were divided laparoscopically using the Endo-GIA 30-2.0 and 30-2.5 mm in four pigs, respectively. The arterial and venous segments were harvested en bloc for ex vivo burst pressure studies. Results: Both 2.0-mm and 2.5-mm staples achieved vessel sealing at supraphysiologic mean burst pressures (≥310 mmHg). There were no statistical differences between mean burst pressures of vessels stapled by 2.0-mm compared to 2.5-mm staples. Both staples sealed arteries up to 17 mm and veins up to 22 mm in diameter. Conclusion: Endo-GIA 30-2.0 mm and 30-2.5 mm vascular staples are equivalent in sealing vessels at supraphysiologic mean burst pressures.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	961-963
Number of pages	3
Journal	Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume	18
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8546-6
State	Published - Jun 2004
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Blood vessels
Hemostasis
Laparoscopy
Surgical equipment
Swine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1007/s00464-003-8546-6

Cite this

@article{bdac74122d7448e2b51a3fad2c778833,

title = "Effect of Endo-GIA vascular staple size on laparoscopic vessel sealing in a porcine model",

abstract = "Background: Two sizes of endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis (Endo-GIA) staples are currently available for vascular control. The purpose of this study was to compare the Endo-GIA 30-2.0 mm with the Endo-GIA 30-2.5 mm vascular staple. Methods: The renal blood vessels, aorta, and vena cava were divided laparoscopically using the Endo-GIA 30-2.0 and 30-2.5 mm in four pigs, respectively. The arterial and venous segments were harvested en bloc for ex vivo burst pressure studies. Results: Both 2.0-mm and 2.5-mm staples achieved vessel sealing at supraphysiologic mean burst pressures (≥310 mmHg). There were no statistical differences between mean burst pressures of vessels stapled by 2.0-mm compared to 2.5-mm staples. Both staples sealed arteries up to 17 mm and veins up to 22 mm in diameter. Conclusion: Endo-GIA 30-2.0 mm and 30-2.5 mm vascular staples are equivalent in sealing vessels at supraphysiologic mean burst pressures.",

keywords = "Blood vessels, Hemostasis, Laparoscopy, Surgical equipment, Swine",

author = "A. El-Hakim and Y. Cai and R. Marcovich and P. Pinto and Lee, {B. R.}",

year = "2004",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1007/s00464-003-8546-6",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "18",

pages = "961--963",

journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",

issn = "0930-2794",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Endo-GIA vascular staple size on laparoscopic vessel sealing in a porcine model

AU - El-Hakim, A.

AU - Cai, Y.

AU - Marcovich, R.

AU - Pinto, P.

AU - Lee, B. R.

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Background: Two sizes of endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis (Endo-GIA) staples are currently available for vascular control. The purpose of this study was to compare the Endo-GIA 30-2.0 mm with the Endo-GIA 30-2.5 mm vascular staple. Methods: The renal blood vessels, aorta, and vena cava were divided laparoscopically using the Endo-GIA 30-2.0 and 30-2.5 mm in four pigs, respectively. The arterial and venous segments were harvested en bloc for ex vivo burst pressure studies. Results: Both 2.0-mm and 2.5-mm staples achieved vessel sealing at supraphysiologic mean burst pressures (≥310 mmHg). There were no statistical differences between mean burst pressures of vessels stapled by 2.0-mm compared to 2.5-mm staples. Both staples sealed arteries up to 17 mm and veins up to 22 mm in diameter. Conclusion: Endo-GIA 30-2.0 mm and 30-2.5 mm vascular staples are equivalent in sealing vessels at supraphysiologic mean burst pressures.

AB - Background: Two sizes of endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis (Endo-GIA) staples are currently available for vascular control. The purpose of this study was to compare the Endo-GIA 30-2.0 mm with the Endo-GIA 30-2.5 mm vascular staple. Methods: The renal blood vessels, aorta, and vena cava were divided laparoscopically using the Endo-GIA 30-2.0 and 30-2.5 mm in four pigs, respectively. The arterial and venous segments were harvested en bloc for ex vivo burst pressure studies. Results: Both 2.0-mm and 2.5-mm staples achieved vessel sealing at supraphysiologic mean burst pressures (≥310 mmHg). There were no statistical differences between mean burst pressures of vessels stapled by 2.0-mm compared to 2.5-mm staples. Both staples sealed arteries up to 17 mm and veins up to 22 mm in diameter. Conclusion: Endo-GIA 30-2.0 mm and 30-2.5 mm vascular staples are equivalent in sealing vessels at supraphysiologic mean burst pressures.

KW - Blood vessels

KW - Hemostasis

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Surgical equipment

KW - Swine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2642551342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2642551342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-003-8546-6

DO - 10.1007/s00464-003-8546-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 15108116

AN - SCOPUS:2642551342

SN - 0930-2794

VL - 18

SP - 961

EP - 963

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

IS - 6

ER -

Effect of Endo-GIA vascular staple size on laparoscopic vessel sealing in a porcine model

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this