Abstract
The management of watersheds is most commonly thought to involve the hydrological, physical, biological and engineering sciences. However, economics also has a role in watershed management planning. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is the most common type of economic analysis used for watershed planning. CBA measures, in monetary terms, a project's inputs and outputs over the service life of the project. Under CBA, a project that yields discounted net benefits which exceed costs, is said to be "economically efficient." Economically efficient projects are desirable because they represent a potential Pareto improvement, which is to say that society can gain an economic surplus, hence a net improvement, from the activity. CBA is a useful decision method when the watershed manager must make a decision based solely upon economic efficiency. However, watershed managers frequently must deal with multiple decision criteria. Multi-Criteria Decision Models (MCDMs) have been developed for such situations. "Economics" can enter into MCDMs as one of the decision criteria. Examples of MCDMs include linear and goal programming, Multi-Attribute Utility Theory and the Analytic Hierarchy Process. With regard to the study of economics in watershed management curricula in American universities, economics and the management sciences play a small but important role in watershed education. However, with the trend toward greater stakeholder participation in watershed decisions, future curricula could see a greater demand for more social and management science courses.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 343-357 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Annals of Arid Zone |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 3-4 |
State | Published - 2002 |
Keywords
- Cost-benefit analysis
- Economics
- Multi-criteria decision methods
- Watershed management
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Animal Science and Zoology
- Agronomy and Crop Science