TY - JOUR
T1 - Earthen embankment breaching
AU - The ASCE/EWRI Task Committee on Dam/Levee Breaching (Break Fluvial Processes)
AU - Wu, Weiming
AU - Altinakar, Mustafa S.
AU - Song, Chung R.
AU - Al-Riffai, Mahmoud
AU - Bergman, Nathaniel
AU - Bradford, Scott F.
AU - Cao, Zhixian
AU - Chen, Qin J.
AU - Constantinescu, Serban G.
AU - Duan, Jennifer G.
AU - Gee, D. Michael
AU - Greimann, Blair
AU - Hanson, Greg
AU - He, Zhiguo
AU - Hegedus, Pal
AU - Van Hoestenberghe, Thomas
AU - Huddleston, David
AU - Hughes, Steven A.
AU - Imran, Jasim
AU - Jia, Yafei
AU - Jorgeson, Jeffrey D.
AU - Kahawita, René
AU - Klumpp, Cassie C.
AU - Lai, Yong
AU - Langendoen, Eddy J.
AU - Liu, Shielan
AU - Moreda, Fekadu
AU - Morris, Mark
AU - Morvan, Hervé
AU - Orendorff, Bryan
AU - Pak, Jay
AU - Peeters, Patrik
AU - Reed, Seann
AU - Sanders, Brett F.
AU - Scott, Steve H.
AU - Soares-Frazao, Sandra
AU - Sutherland, James
AU - Teal, Martin J.
AU - Tsubaki, Ryota
AU - Wahl, Tony L.
AU - Weston, David M.
AU - Williams, David T.
AU - Zech, Yves
AU - Zhang, Limin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ASCE.
PY - 2011/12/13
Y1 - 2011/12/13
N2 - Embankment breaching processes are very complex and involve mixed-regime free-surface flow with overfalls and hydraulic jumps, pressurized pipe flow, strong vertical and lateral erosion, discrete mass failure, and headcut migration. The failure mode and mechanism are affected by upstream and downstream water conditions, embankment configurations, and soil properties and state. Great progress has been made to investigate embankment breaching processes through laboratory and field experiments and real-world case studies. However, most laboratory experiments were for smallscale homogeneous embankments, only a few outdoor experiments were conducted at large scales (up to several meters in height) and/or were of composite construction, and only limited data sets for historical embankment failures were sufficiently documented. A number of parametric, simplified physically-based, and detailed multidimensional physically-based embankment breach models have been established in the past decades, but prediction with these models involves significant uncertainties. The biggest limitation of the existing breach models is quantifying erosion rates or erodibility of cohesive soils and sediment entrainment under embankment break/breaching flows. It is important to conduct more large-scale laboratory experiments and field case studies to improve existing embankment breach models or develop new ones.
AB - Embankment breaching processes are very complex and involve mixed-regime free-surface flow with overfalls and hydraulic jumps, pressurized pipe flow, strong vertical and lateral erosion, discrete mass failure, and headcut migration. The failure mode and mechanism are affected by upstream and downstream water conditions, embankment configurations, and soil properties and state. Great progress has been made to investigate embankment breaching processes through laboratory and field experiments and real-world case studies. However, most laboratory experiments were for smallscale homogeneous embankments, only a few outdoor experiments were conducted at large scales (up to several meters in height) and/or were of composite construction, and only limited data sets for historical embankment failures were sufficiently documented. A number of parametric, simplified physically-based, and detailed multidimensional physically-based embankment breach models have been established in the past decades, but prediction with these models involves significant uncertainties. The biggest limitation of the existing breach models is quantifying erosion rates or erodibility of cohesive soils and sediment entrainment under embankment break/breaching flows. It is important to conduct more large-scale laboratory experiments and field case studies to improve existing embankment breach models or develop new ones.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855959080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855959080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000498
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000498
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84855959080
SN - 0733-9429
VL - 137
SP - 1549
EP - 1564
JO - Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
JF - Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
IS - 12
ER -