TY - JOUR
T1 - Early Upper Paleolithic shell beads at üçaĝi{dotless}zli{dotless} Cave I (Turkey)
T2 - Technology and the socioeconomic context of ornament life-histories
AU - Stiner, Mary C.
AU - Kuhn, Steven L.
AU - Güleç, Erksin
N1 - Funding Information:
This study would not have been possible without the supporting efforts over many years of students and colleagues from Ankara University, the University of Arizona, and other institutions. We are very grateful to them for their hard work and good company. Thanks to David Reese for generously sharing his unpublished observations on the condition of the shell assemblages from Ksar 'Akil. We also gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the Turkish Directorate of Monuments and Museums (Anıtlar ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü) and the Antakya Museum. Thanks, also, to the JHE reviewers and editors for their many detailed comments and criticisms, which have helped us a great deal for improving this study. The field research that yielded the UcI ornament assemblages was carried out with the financial support of the United States National Science Foundation (grants SBR-9804722 and BCS-0106433 ) and the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation . Additional funding was provided by the University of Arizona , Ankara University , The L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, and the Turkish Ministry of Culture .
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - Ten early Upper Paleolithic layers in üçaĝi{dotless}zli{dotless} Cave I (41-29 uncalibrated ky BP) on the Hatay coast of southern Turkey preserve a rich and varied record of early Upper Paleolithic life, including the production and use of large numbers of shell ornaments. This study examines shell bead production, use, and discard in relation to site function and the diversity of on-site human activities. Four factors are expected to contribute to variation in the ornament assemblages, one environmental and three behavioral. The behavioral factors relate to winnowing for quality as a function of distance from the raw material source, changes in the size of user groups, and symbol standardization. The accumulation rates for shell beads, bones, and stone tools paralleled one another through time, indicating that ornament discard followed the pulse of daily life at this site. All stages of manufacture and use are well represented in each assemblage, and half or more of the ornaments show evidence of extended use. Changes in the local marine environment do not explain much of the variation in the assemblages, pointing instead to behavioral causes. The richness of shell types that were collected as raw material correlates to greater exploitation of edible marine shellfish and greater occupation intensity. Much of this variation in the ornament raw material was eliminated during the manufacture stage, almost certainly reflecting the influence of cultural norms. A focus on basket-shaped shells changed remarkably little over thousands of years, despite significant changes in other domains of technology. This last result suggests that beads were the most irreducible and conservative elements of more complex design traditions.
AB - Ten early Upper Paleolithic layers in üçaĝi{dotless}zli{dotless} Cave I (41-29 uncalibrated ky BP) on the Hatay coast of southern Turkey preserve a rich and varied record of early Upper Paleolithic life, including the production and use of large numbers of shell ornaments. This study examines shell bead production, use, and discard in relation to site function and the diversity of on-site human activities. Four factors are expected to contribute to variation in the ornament assemblages, one environmental and three behavioral. The behavioral factors relate to winnowing for quality as a function of distance from the raw material source, changes in the size of user groups, and symbol standardization. The accumulation rates for shell beads, bones, and stone tools paralleled one another through time, indicating that ornament discard followed the pulse of daily life at this site. All stages of manufacture and use are well represented in each assemblage, and half or more of the ornaments show evidence of extended use. Changes in the local marine environment do not explain much of the variation in the assemblages, pointing instead to behavioral causes. The richness of shell types that were collected as raw material correlates to greater exploitation of edible marine shellfish and greater occupation intensity. Much of this variation in the ornament raw material was eliminated during the manufacture stage, almost certainly reflecting the influence of cultural norms. A focus on basket-shaped shells changed remarkably little over thousands of years, despite significant changes in other domains of technology. This last result suggests that beads were the most irreducible and conservative elements of more complex design traditions.
KW - Shell ornaments
KW - Taphonomy
KW - Technological experiments
KW - Zooarchaeology
KW - üçaĝizli
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875907139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875907139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.01.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.01.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 23481346
AN - SCOPUS:84875907139
SN - 0047-2484
VL - 64
SP - 380
EP - 398
JO - Journal of human evolution
JF - Journal of human evolution
IS - 5
ER -