TY - JOUR
T1 - Early career academic staff support
T2 - evaluating mentoring networks
AU - Denard Thomas, J.
AU - Gail Lunsford, Laura
AU - Rodrigues, Helena A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, © 2015 Association for Tertiary Education Management and the LH Martin Institute for Tertiary Education Leadership and Management.
PY - 2015/5/4
Y1 - 2015/5/4
N2 - Which academics benefit from participation in formal mentoring programmes? This study examined the needs and mentoring networks of new academics with evaluative data from a pilot mentoring programme. Themes from these data point towards re-envisioning initiatives for academic staff development. First, an examination of the expansion of mentoring networks of new staff suggests that some need more support than others. Second, new academics have common needs in professional development support, despite disciplinary differences and the beliefs of many administrators. Third, evaluation of new academics’ self-reports show that there are differences in mentoring preferences that influence programme participation. Fourth, participant reports reveal both perceived benefits and some detriments of programme participation. Fifth, a somewhat widespread academic mentoring mindset was identified that may lead to problematic mentoring outcomes depending on demographic characteristics of protégés. Implications for administrators in charge of staff development and avenues for future research are presented.
AB - Which academics benefit from participation in formal mentoring programmes? This study examined the needs and mentoring networks of new academics with evaluative data from a pilot mentoring programme. Themes from these data point towards re-envisioning initiatives for academic staff development. First, an examination of the expansion of mentoring networks of new staff suggests that some need more support than others. Second, new academics have common needs in professional development support, despite disciplinary differences and the beliefs of many administrators. Third, evaluation of new academics’ self-reports show that there are differences in mentoring preferences that influence programme participation. Fourth, participant reports reveal both perceived benefits and some detriments of programme participation. Fifth, a somewhat widespread academic mentoring mindset was identified that may lead to problematic mentoring outcomes depending on demographic characteristics of protégés. Implications for administrators in charge of staff development and avenues for future research are presented.
KW - academic staff
KW - faculty
KW - higher education
KW - mentoring
KW - networks
KW - professional development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929948995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929948995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034426
DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034426
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84929948995
SN - 1360-080X
VL - 37
SP - 320
EP - 329
JO - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
JF - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
IS - 3
ER -