TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Ocular Melanoma as a Tool to Predict Metastatic Potential
AU - Wei, Wenbo
AU - Jia, Guang
AU - Von Tengg-Kobligk, Hendrik
AU - Heverhagen, Johannes T.
AU - Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed
AU - Wei, Lai
AU - Christoforidis, John B.
AU - Davidorf, Frederick
AU - Knopp, Michael V.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the *Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging and Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; †Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA; ‡Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; §Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, and ||Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and ¶Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, The University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, AZ. Received for publication October 14, 2016; accepted December 14, 2016. Correspondence to: Michael V. Knopp, MD, PhD, Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging and Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (e‐mail: [email protected]). This study was supported by the Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, its development fund, the OSU Medical Center Imaging signature program, and the Ohio Third Frontier Funding ODSA TECH 09-028 and TECH 11-044. Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000598
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/9/1
Y1 - 2017/9/1
N2 - Purpose This study explores the capability of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to differentiate tumor characteristics of metastatic and nonmetastatic choroidal melanoma as a potential tool for patient management. Materials and Methods A total of 13 patients (69 ± 9 years) with choroidal melanoma were imaged using DCE-MRI on a 3-T MRI system with a 16-channel head coil. The Tofts 2-compartment model was chosen for quantification, and parameters K trans (the transfer constant from the blood plasma to the extracellular space) and K ep (the transfer constant from the extracellular space to the blood plasma) were calculated and compared. Metastasis was excluded by subsequent clinical work-up or confirmed by histology after targeted biopsy. Results Six patients were diagnosed with metastatic melanoma and 7 without. All orbital tumors were at least larger than 2 mm. A significant difference was identified in K trans between patients with (0.73 ± 0.18/min) and without (1.00 ± 0.21/min) metastatic melanoma (P = 0.03), whereas the difference was not significantly shown in K ep (2.58 ± 1.54/min of metastatic patients vs 2.98 ± 1.83/min of nonmetastatic patients, P = 0.67). Conclusions Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to differentiate orbital melanomas with metastatic and nonmetastatic spread. Thus, DCE-MRI has the potential to be an in vivo imaging technique to predict early which patients are prone to metastatic disease.
AB - Purpose This study explores the capability of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to differentiate tumor characteristics of metastatic and nonmetastatic choroidal melanoma as a potential tool for patient management. Materials and Methods A total of 13 patients (69 ± 9 years) with choroidal melanoma were imaged using DCE-MRI on a 3-T MRI system with a 16-channel head coil. The Tofts 2-compartment model was chosen for quantification, and parameters K trans (the transfer constant from the blood plasma to the extracellular space) and K ep (the transfer constant from the extracellular space to the blood plasma) were calculated and compared. Metastasis was excluded by subsequent clinical work-up or confirmed by histology after targeted biopsy. Results Six patients were diagnosed with metastatic melanoma and 7 without. All orbital tumors were at least larger than 2 mm. A significant difference was identified in K trans between patients with (0.73 ± 0.18/min) and without (1.00 ± 0.21/min) metastatic melanoma (P = 0.03), whereas the difference was not significantly shown in K ep (2.58 ± 1.54/min of metastatic patients vs 2.98 ± 1.83/min of nonmetastatic patients, P = 0.67). Conclusions Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to differentiate orbital melanomas with metastatic and nonmetastatic spread. Thus, DCE-MRI has the potential to be an in vivo imaging technique to predict early which patients are prone to metastatic disease.
KW - K trans
KW - choroidal melanoma
KW - dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
KW - metastasis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030620938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030620938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000598
DO - 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000598
M3 - Article
C2 - 28448404
AN - SCOPUS:85030620938
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 41
SP - 823
EP - 827
JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
IS - 5
ER -