Drivers and Barriers for Adopting Accreditation at Local Health Departments for Their Performance Improvement Effort

Sandra S. Liu, Beth Meyerson, Jerry King, Yuehwern Yih, Mina Ostovari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: A national system of voluntary public health accreditation for state, local, and tribal health departments (local health departments [LHDs]) is part of a movement that aims to improve public health performance with ultimate impact on population health outcomes. Indiana is a good setting for the study of LHD accreditation adoption because several LHDs reported de-adopting accreditation in a recent statewide survey and because 71% of Indiana counties serve populations of 50 000 or less. Design: A systematic method of analyzing qualitative data based on the Performance Improvement Model framework to expand our understanding of de-adoption of public health accreditation. Setting/Participants: In 2015, we conducted a key informant interview study of the 3 LHDs that decided to delay their engagement in the accreditation based on findings from an Indiana survey on LHD accreditation adoption. The study is an exploration of LHD accreditation de-adoption and of the contributions made to its understanding by the Performance Improvement Model. Result: The study found that top management team members are those who champion accreditation adoption, and that organizational structure and culture facilitate the staff's embracing of the change. The Performance Improvement Model was found to enhance the elucidation of the inner domain elements of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research in the context of de-adoption of public health accreditation. Conclusion: Governing entities' policies and priorities appear to mediate whether the LHDs are able to continue accreditation pursuit. Lacking any of these driving forces appears to be associated with decisions to de-adoption of accreditation. Further work is necessary to discern specific elements mediating decisions to pursue accreditation. This study demonstrates the added knowledge of Performance Improvement Model (PIM) to the CFIR framework. A large scale study is called to further clarify and discern supports of specific to the needs of individual LHDs for their performance improvement effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e25-e35
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
  • implementation science
  • local health department (LHD)
  • Performance Improvement Model (PIM)
  • public health accreditation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drivers and Barriers for Adopting Accreditation at Local Health Departments for Their Performance Improvement Effort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this