TY - JOUR
T1 - Domestic calf mortality and producer detection rates in the Mexican wolf recovery area
T2 - Implications for livestock management and carnivore compensation schemes
AU - Breck, Stewart W.
AU - Kluever, Bryan M.
AU - Panasci, Michael
AU - Oakleaf, John
AU - Johnson, Terry
AU - Ballard, Warren
AU - Howery, Larry
AU - Bergman, David L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this research was provided primarily by the Arizona Game and Fish Department and New Mexico Game and Fish Department, with additional funds from USDA-APHIS-WS-Arizona Program, USDA-WS-National Wildlife Research Center, US Forest Service, California Wolf Center, and T&E Inc. We thank the following for their dedication in the field: A. Bristol, M. Robin, L.G. Fornara, J. Reed, S. Smith, J. Dolphin, A. Block, J. Timmer, and numerous volunteers. Special thanks to J.B. Miller and S. Sterling from USDA-APHIS-WS for their assistance with field necropsies and support with monitoring calves throughout the study. T. Veenendaal, C. Carrillo, and P. Valentino provided essential logistical support. We thank the producers and their employees for their patience and cooperation throughout this study and their willingness to participate in this challenging endeavor. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the view of the agency.
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - Conserving large carnivores throughout the world will often require that they share the landscape with livestock. Minimizing depredations and increasing tolerance by livestock producers will be critical for conservation efforts. To investigate factors influencing calf mortality and producer detection rates (i.e., number of livestock killed by predators, found by producers, and correctly classified as to cause of death), we monitored radio-tagged domestic calves at two sites in the Mexican wolf recovery area (East Eagle [EE] and Adobe Ranch [AR]). Study areas differed in grazing practices, density of predators (mountain lions, black bears, coyotes, and Mexican wolves), and amount of effort spent monitoring cattle. We radiotagged 618 calves over 3.5. years, and 312 calves over 2 years on the EE and AR, respectively. The overall proportion of radioed calves that died was higher on the EE (6.5%) than on the AR (1.9%). Predators (especially mountain lions) accounted for 85% of mortality on the EE and 0% on the AR. Calves selected by predators were on average 25 days younger than the surviving cohort. Our results indicate that year-round calving, especially in areas with high predator densities, are subject to higher losses primarily because calves are exposed to mortality agents for longer periods of time rather than having higher natural rates of mortality. We found a significant difference in producer detection rates between study sites, likely due to differences in the intensity of monitoring cattle between sites. On the EE, the producer detected 77.5% of mortalities and on the AR, the producer detected 33% of mortalities. Our results support changing husbandry practices to limit calving to a seasonal endeavor and that performance payment may be a better compensation strategy than ex post compensation schemes.
AB - Conserving large carnivores throughout the world will often require that they share the landscape with livestock. Minimizing depredations and increasing tolerance by livestock producers will be critical for conservation efforts. To investigate factors influencing calf mortality and producer detection rates (i.e., number of livestock killed by predators, found by producers, and correctly classified as to cause of death), we monitored radio-tagged domestic calves at two sites in the Mexican wolf recovery area (East Eagle [EE] and Adobe Ranch [AR]). Study areas differed in grazing practices, density of predators (mountain lions, black bears, coyotes, and Mexican wolves), and amount of effort spent monitoring cattle. We radiotagged 618 calves over 3.5. years, and 312 calves over 2 years on the EE and AR, respectively. The overall proportion of radioed calves that died was higher on the EE (6.5%) than on the AR (1.9%). Predators (especially mountain lions) accounted for 85% of mortality on the EE and 0% on the AR. Calves selected by predators were on average 25 days younger than the surviving cohort. Our results indicate that year-round calving, especially in areas with high predator densities, are subject to higher losses primarily because calves are exposed to mortality agents for longer periods of time rather than having higher natural rates of mortality. We found a significant difference in producer detection rates between study sites, likely due to differences in the intensity of monitoring cattle between sites. On the EE, the producer detected 77.5% of mortalities and on the AR, the producer detected 33% of mortalities. Our results support changing husbandry practices to limit calving to a seasonal endeavor and that performance payment may be a better compensation strategy than ex post compensation schemes.
KW - Compensation schemes
KW - Livestock
KW - Mortality
KW - Predator
KW - Producer detection rate
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79451469962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79451469962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.014
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79451469962
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 144
SP - 930
EP - 936
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
IS - 2
ER -