TY - JOUR
T1 - Does emphasizing management bias decrease auditors’ sensitivity to measurement imprecision?
AU - Van Landuyt, Ben W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper is based on my dissertation at the University of Texas at Austin. I appreciate thoughtful guidance from my dissertation committee: Dave Harrison, Volker Laux, Jaime Schmidt, Brian White, and, especially, Steve Kachelmeier (chair). I am grateful for comments from Dave Piercey (editor), two anonymous reviewers, workshop participants at the 2017 ABO Research Conference, the University of Arizona, Case Western Reserve University, the University of Central Florida, Cornell University, Indiana University, and the University of Texas at Austin, and for helpful suggestions from EB Altiero, Lori Bhaskar, Rob Bloomfield, Jason Brown, Tony Bucaro, Melissa Carlisle, Shannon Chen, Katharine Drake, Robert Freeman, Shannon Garavaglia, Jackie Hammersley, Max Hewitt, Leslie Hodder, Pat Hopkins, Ross Jennings, Jeff Johanns, Joseph Johnson, Khim Kelly, Bill Kinney, Lisa Koonce, Zheng Leitter, Bob Libby, Kim Mendoza, Brian Monsen, Charles Noussair, Aaron Roeschley, Dan Russomanno, Jeff Schatzberg, Mark Taylor, and Xinyu Zhang. Thank you to the participating auditors, and Katie Maxwell and Michael Madsen for their assistance with recruiting. I gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Eugene and Dora Bonham Endowment, the Red McCombs School of Business, and the Eller College of Management.
Funding Information:
This paper is based on my dissertation at the University of Texas at Austin. I appreciate thoughtful guidance from my dissertation committee: Dave Harrison, Volker Laux, Jaime Schmidt, Brian White, and, especially, Steve Kachelmeier (chair). I am grateful for comments from Dave Piercey (editor), two anonymous reviewers, workshop participants at the 2017 ABO Research Conference, the University of Arizona, Case Western Reserve University, the University of Central Florida, Cornell University, Indiana University, and the University of Texas at Austin, and for helpful suggestions from EB Altiero, Lori Bhaskar, Rob Bloomfield, Jason Brown, Tony Bucaro, Melissa Carlisle, Shannon Chen, Katharine Drake, Robert Freeman, Shannon Garavaglia, Jackie Hammersley, Max Hewitt, Leslie Hodder, Pat Hopkins, Ross Jennings, Jeff Johanns, Joseph Johnson, Khim Kelly, Bill Kinney, Lisa Koonce, Zheng Leitter, Bob Libby, Kim Mendoza, Brian Monsen, Charles Noussair, Aaron Roeschley, Dan Russomanno, Jeff Schatzberg, Mark Taylor, and Xinyu Zhang. Thank you to the participating auditors, and Katie Maxwell and Michael Madsen for their assistance with recruiting. I gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Eugene and Dora Bonham Endowment , the Red McCombs School of Business , and the Eller College of Management .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Both management bias and measurement imprecision threaten the accurate reporting of complex accounting estimates, yet audit policymakers and practitioners often place a strong emphasis on bias. I examine whether directing auditors’ attention towards management bias can come at the expense of insufficient auditor sensitivity to measurement imprecision, potentially threatening overall audit quality. My primary investigation, Study 1, finds that when managers’ explicit incentives to bias financial reports are relatively weaker, an imbalanced emphasis on bias causes auditor-like participants in a stylized setting to “lower their guard” to a greater extent than when environmental factors place a more balanced emphasis on bias and imprecision. Study 2 indicates that an imbalanced emphasis on imprecision does not similarly distract auditors from bias. Study 3 utilizes a more contextually rich setting and demonstrates that an imbalanced emphasis on bias prompts even professional auditors to neglect imprecision. Accordingly, this paper suggests that a balanced emphasis on both management bias and measurement imprecision can mitigate negative consequences of auditors focusing on the former and neglecting the latter.
AB - Both management bias and measurement imprecision threaten the accurate reporting of complex accounting estimates, yet audit policymakers and practitioners often place a strong emphasis on bias. I examine whether directing auditors’ attention towards management bias can come at the expense of insufficient auditor sensitivity to measurement imprecision, potentially threatening overall audit quality. My primary investigation, Study 1, finds that when managers’ explicit incentives to bias financial reports are relatively weaker, an imbalanced emphasis on bias causes auditor-like participants in a stylized setting to “lower their guard” to a greater extent than when environmental factors place a more balanced emphasis on bias and imprecision. Study 2 indicates that an imbalanced emphasis on imprecision does not similarly distract auditors from bias. Study 3 utilizes a more contextually rich setting and demonstrates that an imbalanced emphasis on bias prompts even professional auditors to neglect imprecision. Accordingly, this paper suggests that a balanced emphasis on both management bias and measurement imprecision can mitigate negative consequences of auditors focusing on the former and neglecting the latter.
KW - Accounting estimates
KW - Audit quality
KW - Experimental economics
KW - Judgement and decision-making
KW - Management bias
KW - Measurement imprecision
KW - Risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092011988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092011988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aos.2020.101189
DO - 10.1016/j.aos.2020.101189
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092011988
SN - 0361-3682
VL - 88
JO - Accounting, Organizations and Society
JF - Accounting, Organizations and Society
M1 - 101189
ER -