TY - JOUR
T1 - Do bilingual children have an executive function advantage? Results from inhibition, shifting, and updating tasks
AU - Arizmendi, Genesis D.
AU - Alt, Mary
AU - Gray, Shelley
AU - Hogan, Tiffany P.
AU - Green, Samuel
AU - Cowan, Nelson
N1 - Funding Information:
2These children were part of a larger study: POWWER–Profiles of Word Learning and Working Memory for Educational Research, which was funded by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant R01 DC010784. The full working memory battery was described in Cabbage et al. (2017). Data from the typically developing participants have been reported on in Alt et al. (2017), Cowan et al. (2017), Gray et al. (2017), and Green et al. (2016).
Funding Information:
This work was funded by Grant #R01 DC010784 (with Shelley Gray, PI) from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, and the first author was supported by diversity supplement 3R01DC010784-04S1, also from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. We are deeply grateful to the staff, research associates, school administrators, teachers, children, and families who participated. Muchas gracias a las familias que nos ayudaron a completar esta investigación para aprender mas sobre lo que significa ser bilingüe. Apreciamos su tiempo. Key personnel included (in alphabetical order) Shara Brinkley, Gary Carstensen, Cecilia Figueroa, Karen Guilmette, Trudy Kuo, Bjorg LeSueur, Annelise Pesch, and Jean Zimmer. Many students also contributed to this work including (in alphabetical order) Lauren Baron, Alexander Brown, Nora Schlesinger, Nisha Talanki, and Hui-Chun Yang.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine differences in performance between monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual second graders (aged 7–9 years old) on executive function tasks assessing inhibition, shifting, and updating to contribute more evidence to the ongoing debate about a potential bilingual executive function advantage. Method: One hundred sixty-seven monolingual English-speaking children and 80 Spanish–English bilingual children were administered 7 tasks on a touchscreen computer in the context of a pirate game. Bayesian statistics were used to determine if there were differences between the monolingual and bilingual groups. Additional analyses involving covariates of maternal level of education and nonverbal intelligence, and matching on these same variables, were also completed. Results: Scaled-information Bayes factor scores more strongly favored the null hypothesis that there were no differences between the bilingual and monolingual groups on any of the executive function tasks. For 2 of the tasks, we found an advantage in favor of the monolingual group. Conclusions: If there is a bilingual advantage in school-aged children, it is not robust across circumstances. We discuss potential factors that might counteract an actual advantage, including task reliability and environmental influences.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine differences in performance between monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual second graders (aged 7–9 years old) on executive function tasks assessing inhibition, shifting, and updating to contribute more evidence to the ongoing debate about a potential bilingual executive function advantage. Method: One hundred sixty-seven monolingual English-speaking children and 80 Spanish–English bilingual children were administered 7 tasks on a touchscreen computer in the context of a pirate game. Bayesian statistics were used to determine if there were differences between the monolingual and bilingual groups. Additional analyses involving covariates of maternal level of education and nonverbal intelligence, and matching on these same variables, were also completed. Results: Scaled-information Bayes factor scores more strongly favored the null hypothesis that there were no differences between the bilingual and monolingual groups on any of the executive function tasks. For 2 of the tasks, we found an advantage in favor of the monolingual group. Conclusions: If there is a bilingual advantage in school-aged children, it is not robust across circumstances. We discuss potential factors that might counteract an actual advantage, including task reliability and environmental influences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049723819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049723819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0107
DO - 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0107
M3 - Article
C2 - 29978206
AN - SCOPUS:85049723819
SN - 0161-1461
VL - 49
SP - 356
EP - 378
JO - Language, speech, and hearing services in schools
JF - Language, speech, and hearing services in schools
IS - 3
ER -