TY - JOUR
T1 - Divergence of explicit and implicit processing speed during associative memory retrieval
AU - Ellmore, Timothy M.
AU - Stouffer, Kari
AU - Nadel, Lynn
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was submitted in partial fulfillment of a doctoral dissertation by T.M.E. The authors would like to thank Bruce L. McNaughton, Mary Peterson, Nathan Insel, and Betty Glisky for helpful discussions and suggestions. The experiments were supported by an NIH grant to B.L.M (MH046823) and an SBSRI Dissertation Research Grant to T.M.E.
PY - 2008/9/10
Y1 - 2008/9/10
N2 - Consolidation theory assumes that as time passes, some memories are strengthened and become resistant to change while other memories are weakened and forgotten. Recent demonstrations that implicit, or procedural, memories are retrieved more efficiently after learning and retention are consistent with the idea that these particular memory traces have strengthened with time, and therefore may be accessed faster. However, it is not clear whether the process of explicit memory retrieval also becomes more efficient with time. In two experiments, we explored 1) how much time is required for retrieval of separate explicit and implicit components of hippocampal-dependent visuomotor associative memories after variable retention intervals, and 2) how the explicit and implicit processing times change when the associations are rehearsed after initial retrieval. We found that after learning and retention, explicit and implicit processing times diverged: 1) the time taken to retrieve successfully the explicit component increased relative to a pre-retention baseline but, after spaced rehearsal, decreased, although not to a level significantly below that obtained at the end of learning, and 2) the implicit, or procedural, component processing times continued to gradually decrease after retention, and with continued rehearsal, reached a level significantly below the pre-retention baseline. We conclude that the observed divergence in post-retention reaction times suggests that explicit and implicit memory systems may reorganize differently after learning, and that as a consequence, different amounts of processing time may be required for retrieval of these different memory components.
AB - Consolidation theory assumes that as time passes, some memories are strengthened and become resistant to change while other memories are weakened and forgotten. Recent demonstrations that implicit, or procedural, memories are retrieved more efficiently after learning and retention are consistent with the idea that these particular memory traces have strengthened with time, and therefore may be accessed faster. However, it is not clear whether the process of explicit memory retrieval also becomes more efficient with time. In two experiments, we explored 1) how much time is required for retrieval of separate explicit and implicit components of hippocampal-dependent visuomotor associative memories after variable retention intervals, and 2) how the explicit and implicit processing times change when the associations are rehearsed after initial retrieval. We found that after learning and retention, explicit and implicit processing times diverged: 1) the time taken to retrieve successfully the explicit component increased relative to a pre-retention baseline but, after spaced rehearsal, decreased, although not to a level significantly below that obtained at the end of learning, and 2) the implicit, or procedural, component processing times continued to gradually decrease after retention, and with continued rehearsal, reached a level significantly below the pre-retention baseline. We conclude that the observed divergence in post-retention reaction times suggests that explicit and implicit memory systems may reorganize differently after learning, and that as a consequence, different amounts of processing time may be required for retrieval of these different memory components.
KW - Conditional associative learning
KW - Consolidation
KW - Hippocampus
KW - Memory retrieval
KW - Reaction times
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/49849093521
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49849093521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.011
DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 18655778
AN - SCOPUS:49849093521
SN - 0006-8993
VL - 1229
SP - 155
EP - 166
JO - Brain Research
JF - Brain Research
ER -