TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital skin imaging applications, part II
T2 - a comprehensive survey of post-acquisition image utilization features and technology standards
AU - the ISIC Technique Working Group
AU - Sun, Mary D.
AU - Kentley, Jonathan
AU - Wilson, Britney W.
AU - Soyer, H. Peter
AU - Curiel-Lewandrowski, Clara N.
AU - Rotemberg, Veronica M.
AU - Halpern, Allan C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Background: Despite the increasing ubiquity and accessibility of teledermatology applications, few studies have comprehensively surveyed their features and technical standards. Importantly, features implemented after the point of capture are often intended to augment image utilization, while technical standards affect interoperability with existing healthcare systems. We aim to comprehensively survey image utilization features and technical characteristics found within publicly discoverable digital skin imaging applications. Materials and Methods: Applications were identified and categorized as described in Part I. Included applications were then further assessed by three independent reviewers for post-imaging content, tools, and functionality. Publicly available information was used to determine the presence or absence of relevant technology standards and/or data characteristics. Results: A total of 20 post-image acquisition features were identified across three general categories: (1) metadata attachment, (2) functional tools (i.e., those that utilized images or in-app content to perform a user-directed function), and (3) image processing. Over 80% of all applications implemented metadata features, with nearly half having metadata features only. Individual feature occurred and feature richness varied significantly by primary audience (p < 0.0001) and function (p < 0.0001). On average, each application included under three features. Less than half of all applications requested consent for user-uploaded photos and fewer than 10% provided clear data use and privacy policies. Conclusion: Post-imaging functionality in skin imaging applications varies significantly by primary audience and intended function, though nearly all applications implemented metadata labeling. Technical standards are often not implemented or reported consistently. Gaps in the provision of clear consent, data privacy, and data use policies should be urgently addressed.
AB - Background: Despite the increasing ubiquity and accessibility of teledermatology applications, few studies have comprehensively surveyed their features and technical standards. Importantly, features implemented after the point of capture are often intended to augment image utilization, while technical standards affect interoperability with existing healthcare systems. We aim to comprehensively survey image utilization features and technical characteristics found within publicly discoverable digital skin imaging applications. Materials and Methods: Applications were identified and categorized as described in Part I. Included applications were then further assessed by three independent reviewers for post-imaging content, tools, and functionality. Publicly available information was used to determine the presence or absence of relevant technology standards and/or data characteristics. Results: A total of 20 post-image acquisition features were identified across three general categories: (1) metadata attachment, (2) functional tools (i.e., those that utilized images or in-app content to perform a user-directed function), and (3) image processing. Over 80% of all applications implemented metadata features, with nearly half having metadata features only. Individual feature occurred and feature richness varied significantly by primary audience (p < 0.0001) and function (p < 0.0001). On average, each application included under three features. Less than half of all applications requested consent for user-uploaded photos and fewer than 10% provided clear data use and privacy policies. Conclusion: Post-imaging functionality in skin imaging applications varies significantly by primary audience and intended function, though nearly all applications implemented metadata labeling. Technical standards are often not implemented or reported consistently. Gaps in the provision of clear consent, data privacy, and data use policies should be urgently addressed.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - clinical imaging
KW - digital tools
KW - mobile applications
KW - quality assurance
KW - teledermatology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139074812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139074812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/srt.13195
DO - 10.1111/srt.13195
M3 - Article
C2 - 36181365
AN - SCOPUS:85139074812
SN - 0909-752X
VL - 28
SP - 771
EP - 779
JO - Skin Research and Technology
JF - Skin Research and Technology
IS - 6
ER -