@article{d3e5ab01ce834b58ba69c394aa0a3d39,
title = "Did workers pay for the passage of workers{\textquoteright} compensation laws?",
abstract = "Market responses to legislative reforms often mitigate the expected gains that reformers promise in legislation. Contemporaries hailed workers' compensation as a boon to workers because it raised the amount of postaccident compensation paid to injured workers. Despite the large gains to workers, employers often supported the legislation. Analysis of several wage samples from the early 1900s shows that employers were able to pass a significant part of the added costs of higher postaccident compensation on to some workers in the form of reductions in wages. The size of the wage offsets, however, was smaller for union workers.",
author = "Fishback, {Price V.} and Kantor, {Shawn Everett}",
note = "Funding Information: *Earlier versions of this article were presented at the 1992 Cliometrics Conference, 1992 Social Science History Conference, and 1992 Western Economic Association meetings and in seminars at the University of Arizona; the California Institute of Technology; Columbia University; Cornell University; the University of California, Davis and Los Angeles; and the Hoover Institution. We thank numerous participants at these meetings and seminars for their valuable comments. In addition, we thank Lawrence Katz, James Ratliff, Stanley Reynolds, John Wooders, and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions. This research has been supported by the Earhart Foundation (Fishback), the University of Arizona Foundation (Kantor), and the National Science, Foundation, Grant No. SBR-9223058.",
year = "1995",
month = aug,
doi = "10.2307/2946697",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "713--742",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Economics",
issn = "0033-5533",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",
}