TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Adults with Strabismus
AU - Hatt, Sarah R.
AU - Leske, David A.
AU - Bradley, Elizabeth A.
AU - Cole, Stephen R.
AU - Holmes, Jonathan M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants EY015799 (JMH), EY013844 (EAB), Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY (JMH as Olga Keith Weiss Scholar and an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic), and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN. None of the funding organizations had any role in the design or conduct of this research.
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - Purpose: We report the development of a patient-derived, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire for adults with strabismus. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Twenty-nine patients with strabismus in a first phase, and 32 patients with strabismus, 18 patients with other eye diseases, and 13 visually normal adults in a second phase. Methods: Individual patient interviews generated 181 questionnaire items. For item reduction, we asked 29 patients with strabismus to complete the 181-item questionnaire, analyzed responses, and performed factor analysis. Two prominent factors were identified, and the 10 items with the highest correlation with each factor were selected. The final 20-item questionnaire (10 psychosocial items and 10 function items) was administered to an additional 32 patients with strabismus (22 with diplopia, 10 without diplopia), 13 visually normal adults, and 18 patients with other eye diseases. A 5-point Likert-type scale was used for responses (never = 100, rarely = 75, sometimes = 50, often = 25, and always = 0). Median overall questionnaire scores and psychosocial and function subscale scores, ranging from 0 (worst HRQOL) to 100 (best HRQOL), were compared across groups. Main Outcome Measures: The HRQOL questionnaire response scores. Results: Median overall scores were statistically significantly lower (worse quality of life) for patients with strabismus (56) compared with visually normal adults (95; P<0.001) and patients with other eye diseases (86; P<0.001). Median scores on the psychosocial subscale were significantly lower for strabismus patients (69) compared with visually normal adults (99; P<0.001) and patients with other eye diseases (94; P<0.001). For the function subscale, median scores were again significantly lower for strabismus patients (43) compared with visually normal adults (91; P<0.001) and patients with other eye diseases (78; P<0.001). Conclusions: We have developed a 20-item, patient-derived, HRQOL questionnaire specific for adults with strabismus, with subscales to assess psychosocial and function concerns. This 20-item, condition-specific questionnaire will be useful for assessing HRQOL in individual strabismus patients and also as an outcome measure for clinical trials. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
AB - Purpose: We report the development of a patient-derived, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire for adults with strabismus. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Twenty-nine patients with strabismus in a first phase, and 32 patients with strabismus, 18 patients with other eye diseases, and 13 visually normal adults in a second phase. Methods: Individual patient interviews generated 181 questionnaire items. For item reduction, we asked 29 patients with strabismus to complete the 181-item questionnaire, analyzed responses, and performed factor analysis. Two prominent factors were identified, and the 10 items with the highest correlation with each factor were selected. The final 20-item questionnaire (10 psychosocial items and 10 function items) was administered to an additional 32 patients with strabismus (22 with diplopia, 10 without diplopia), 13 visually normal adults, and 18 patients with other eye diseases. A 5-point Likert-type scale was used for responses (never = 100, rarely = 75, sometimes = 50, often = 25, and always = 0). Median overall questionnaire scores and psychosocial and function subscale scores, ranging from 0 (worst HRQOL) to 100 (best HRQOL), were compared across groups. Main Outcome Measures: The HRQOL questionnaire response scores. Results: Median overall scores were statistically significantly lower (worse quality of life) for patients with strabismus (56) compared with visually normal adults (95; P<0.001) and patients with other eye diseases (86; P<0.001). Median scores on the psychosocial subscale were significantly lower for strabismus patients (69) compared with visually normal adults (99; P<0.001) and patients with other eye diseases (94; P<0.001). For the function subscale, median scores were again significantly lower for strabismus patients (43) compared with visually normal adults (91; P<0.001) and patients with other eye diseases (78; P<0.001). Conclusions: We have developed a 20-item, patient-derived, HRQOL questionnaire specific for adults with strabismus, with subscales to assess psychosocial and function concerns. This 20-item, condition-specific questionnaire will be useful for assessing HRQOL in individual strabismus patients and also as an outcome measure for clinical trials. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57949086070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57949086070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.043
DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.043
M3 - Article
C2 - 19019449
AN - SCOPUS:57949086070
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 116
SP - 139-144.e5
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 1
ER -