Development and Validation of Futility of Resuscitation Measure in Older Adult Trauma Patients

Sai Krishna Bhogadi, Michael Ditillo, Muhammad Haris Khurshid, Collin Stewart, Omar Hejazi, Audrey L. Spencer, Tanya Anand, Adam Nelson, Louis J. Magnotti, Bellal Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to develop and validate Futility of Resuscitation Measure (FoRM) for predicting the futility of resuscitation among older adult trauma patients. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2018) (derivation cohort) and American College of Surgeons level I trauma center database (2017-2022) (validation cohort). We included all severely injured (injury severity score >15) older adult (aged ≥60 y) trauma patients. Patients were stratified into decades of age. Injury characteristics (severe traumatic brain injury [Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8], traumatic brain injury midline shift), physiologic parameters (lowest in-hospital systolic blood pressure [≤1 h], prehospital cardiac arrest), and interventions employed (4-h packed red blood cell transfusions, emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, emergency laparotomy [≤2 h], early vasopressor requirement [≤6 h], and craniectomy) were identified. Regression coefficient-based weighted scoring system was developed using the Schneeweiss method and subsequently validated using institutional database. Results: A total of 5562 patients in derivation cohort and 873 in validation cohort were identified. Mortality was 31% in the derivation cohort and FoRM had excellent discriminative power to predict mortality (area under the receiver operator characteristic = 0.860; 95% confidence interval [0.847-0.872], P < 0.001). Patients with a FoRM score of >16 had a less than 10% chance of survival, while those with a FoRM score of >20 had a less than 5% chance of survival. In validation cohort, mortality rate was 17% and FoRM had good discriminative power (area under the receiver operator characteristic = 0.76; 95% confidence interval [0.71-0.80], P < 0.001). Conclusions: FoRM can reliably identify the risk of futile resuscitation among older adult patients admitted to our level I trauma center.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)591-598
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume301
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Keywords

  • Futility
  • Older adult trauma
  • Resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and Validation of Futility of Resuscitation Measure in Older Adult Trauma Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this