Abstract
This poster reports preliminary user-testing results on four different methods to add terms to a phenotype ontology. A total of 31 graduate students from UA iSchool and three senior botanists participated in two different experiments. Results suggest the Quick Form and WebProtege are preferred by biologists and WikiData and Wizard are not preferred for different reasons.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 838-840 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2019 |
Keywords
- Ontology construction
- biodiversity informatics
- phenotype data management
- user studies
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Computer Science
- Library and Information Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Developing community phenotype ontologies: Understanding users' preferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS