TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a Self-Report Outcome Measure for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
AU - Eton, David T.
AU - Koffler, Karen
AU - Cella, David
AU - Eisenstein, Amy
AU - Astin, John A.
AU - Pelletier, Kenneth R.
AU - Riley, David
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by grant 5P50AT00084-03 from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), and the University of Maryland-Baltimore (UMB).
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - Objective: Our objective was to develop a pilot measure of subjective outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Current options for assessing subjective outcomes in CAM are either too burdensome or fail to represent diverse outcomes. A single measure specifying common, patient-reported outcomes of CAM would be of value. Design: We conducted a three-phase instrument development study. In phase I, 30 CAM-receiving patients and 12 CAM practitioners completed a battery of standardized measures. Participants identified those standardized items relevant to CAM outcome and suggested additional outcome issues. In phase II, 20 CAM-receiving patients completed a Q-sort to determine which items from phase I were most relevant to CAM outcome. In phase III, five experts reviewed the items from phase II for content validity. Setting: An integrative medicine clinic at a private, Midwest US hospital. Participants: CAM patients, practitioners, and researchers and an outcomes measurement specialist. Results: In phase I, 30 standardized items were judged relevant to CAM outcome, and 8 additional items were suggested. In phase II, 29 of the 38 phase I items were deemed at least "moderately relevant" to CAM outcome. In phase III, experts added 15 items, dropped 9 items, and altered 3 items. The 35 resulting items were classified into content domains, forming a testable, pilot version of the instrument.
AB - Objective: Our objective was to develop a pilot measure of subjective outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Current options for assessing subjective outcomes in CAM are either too burdensome or fail to represent diverse outcomes. A single measure specifying common, patient-reported outcomes of CAM would be of value. Design: We conducted a three-phase instrument development study. In phase I, 30 CAM-receiving patients and 12 CAM practitioners completed a battery of standardized measures. Participants identified those standardized items relevant to CAM outcome and suggested additional outcome issues. In phase II, 20 CAM-receiving patients completed a Q-sort to determine which items from phase I were most relevant to CAM outcome. In phase III, five experts reviewed the items from phase II for content validity. Setting: An integrative medicine clinic at a private, Midwest US hospital. Participants: CAM patients, practitioners, and researchers and an outcomes measurement specialist. Results: In phase I, 30 standardized items were judged relevant to CAM outcome, and 8 additional items were suggested. In phase II, 29 of the 38 phase I items were deemed at least "moderately relevant" to CAM outcome. In phase III, experts added 15 items, dropped 9 items, and altered 3 items. The 35 resulting items were classified into content domains, forming a testable, pilot version of the instrument.
KW - CAM
KW - measurement
KW - outcome
KW - quality of life
KW - self-report
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645830977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645830977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.explore.2005.02.007
DO - 10.1016/j.explore.2005.02.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 16781527
AN - SCOPUS:33645830977
SN - 1550-8307
VL - 1
SP - 177
EP - 185
JO - Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing
JF - Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing
IS - 3
ER -