TY - GEN
T1 - Detector integration time issues associated with FLIR performance
AU - Miller, Brian
AU - Flug, Eric
AU - Driggers, Ron
AU - Richardson, Phil
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - IR detector integration time is determined by a combination of the scene or target radiance, the noise of the sensor, and the sensor sensitivity. Typical LWIR detectors such as those used in most U.S. military systems can operate effectively with integration times in the microsecond region. MWIR detectors require much longer integration times (up to several milliseconds) under some conditions to achieve good Noise Equivalent Temperature Difference (NETD). Emerging 3 rd Generation FLIR systems incorporate both MWIR and LWIR detectors. The category of sensors know as uncooled LWIR require thermal time constants, similar to integration time, in the millisecond range to achieve acceptable good NETD. These longer integration times and time constants would not limit performance in a purely static environment, but target or sensor motion can induce blurring under some circumstances. A variety of tasks and mission scenarios were analyzed to determine the integration time requirements for combinations of sensor platform movement and look angle. These were then compared to the typical integration times for MWIR and LWIR detectors to establish the suitability of each band for the functions considered.
AB - IR detector integration time is determined by a combination of the scene or target radiance, the noise of the sensor, and the sensor sensitivity. Typical LWIR detectors such as those used in most U.S. military systems can operate effectively with integration times in the microsecond region. MWIR detectors require much longer integration times (up to several milliseconds) under some conditions to achieve good Noise Equivalent Temperature Difference (NETD). Emerging 3 rd Generation FLIR systems incorporate both MWIR and LWIR detectors. The category of sensors know as uncooled LWIR require thermal time constants, similar to integration time, in the millisecond range to achieve acceptable good NETD. These longer integration times and time constants would not limit performance in a purely static environment, but target or sensor motion can induce blurring under some circumstances. A variety of tasks and mission scenarios were analyzed to determine the integration time requirements for combinations of sensor platform movement and look angle. These were then compared to the typical integration times for MWIR and LWIR detectors to establish the suitability of each band for the functions considered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747661698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747661698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/12.665854
DO - 10.1117/12.665854
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33747661698
SN - 0819462632
SN - 9780819462633
T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
BT - Infrared Imaging Systems
T2 - Infrared Imaging Systems: Design, Analysis, Modeling, and Testing XVII
Y2 - 19 April 2006 through 20 April 2006
ER -