TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of edaphic discontinuities with ground-penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction
AU - Stroh, James C.
AU - Archer, Steve
AU - Doolittle, James A.
AU - Wilding, Larry
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Robert Flinn, Steve Watts, Steve Zitzer, Richard Drees, Ramero Molina (USDA/NRCS), Tony McKinney and the staff of the Texas A&M Soil Characterization Lab for help in field data collection and soil analysis. Neil MacDonald and Mel Northup made helpful comments on portions of the manuscript. This research was conducted in connection with grants from NSF Ecosystems (BSR-9109240), NASA-EOS (NAGW-2662) and The Texas Nature Conservancy.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Quantification of edaphic properties which may regulate the spatial distribution of vegetation is often limited by the expense and labor associated with collecting and analyzing soil samples. Here we evaluate the utility of two technologies, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI), for rapid, extensive and non-destructive mapping of diagnostic subsurface features and soil series map unit boundaries. Strong reflectance from fine-textured, near-surface soils obscured radar signal reflectance from deeper horizons at our field test site in the Rio Grande Plains of southern Texas, USA. As a result, ground-penetrating radar did not delineate known edaphic contrasts along catena gradients. In contrast, EMI consistently distinguished boundaries of soil map units. In several instances, gradients or contrasting inclusions within map units were also identified. In addition, the location and boundary of calcic or cambic-horizon inclusions embedded within a laterally coextensive and well-developed argillic horizon were consistently predicted. Correlations between EMI assessments of apparent conductivity (ECa) and soil properties such as CEC, pH, particle size distribution and extractable bases were low (i.e., explained <6% of the variance), or non-significant. As a result, EMI has a high prospecting utility, but cannot necessarily be used to explain the basis for edaphic contrasts. Results suggest EMI can be a cost-effective tool for soil survey and exploration applications in plant ecology. As such, it is potentially useful for rapidly locating and mapping subsurface discontinuities, thereby reducing the number of ground truth soil samples needed for accurate mapping of soil map unit boundaries. An application, addressing hypotheses proposed to explain the role of edaphic heterogeneity in regulating woody plant distribution in a savanna parkland landscape, is presented.
AB - Quantification of edaphic properties which may regulate the spatial distribution of vegetation is often limited by the expense and labor associated with collecting and analyzing soil samples. Here we evaluate the utility of two technologies, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI), for rapid, extensive and non-destructive mapping of diagnostic subsurface features and soil series map unit boundaries. Strong reflectance from fine-textured, near-surface soils obscured radar signal reflectance from deeper horizons at our field test site in the Rio Grande Plains of southern Texas, USA. As a result, ground-penetrating radar did not delineate known edaphic contrasts along catena gradients. In contrast, EMI consistently distinguished boundaries of soil map units. In several instances, gradients or contrasting inclusions within map units were also identified. In addition, the location and boundary of calcic or cambic-horizon inclusions embedded within a laterally coextensive and well-developed argillic horizon were consistently predicted. Correlations between EMI assessments of apparent conductivity (ECa) and soil properties such as CEC, pH, particle size distribution and extractable bases were low (i.e., explained <6% of the variance), or non-significant. As a result, EMI has a high prospecting utility, but cannot necessarily be used to explain the basis for edaphic contrasts. Results suggest EMI can be a cost-effective tool for soil survey and exploration applications in plant ecology. As such, it is potentially useful for rapidly locating and mapping subsurface discontinuities, thereby reducing the number of ground truth soil samples needed for accurate mapping of soil map unit boundaries. An application, addressing hypotheses proposed to explain the role of edaphic heterogeneity in regulating woody plant distribution in a savanna parkland landscape, is presented.
KW - Apparent conductivity
KW - Argillic horizon
KW - Edaphic discontinuity
KW - Plant-soil relationships
KW - Soil
KW - Soil map unit boundaries
KW - Soil mapping
KW - Soil survey
KW - Spatial variation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034822922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034822922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1017556712316
DO - 10.1023/A:1017556712316
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034822922
SN - 0921-2973
VL - 16
SP - 377
EP - 390
JO - Landscape Ecology
JF - Landscape Ecology
IS - 5
ER -