Detecting deception in person-of-interest statements

Christie Fuller, David P. Biros, Mark Adkins, Judee K. Burgoon, Jay F. Nunamaker, Steven Coulon

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Most humans cannot detect lies at a rate better than chance. Alternative methods of deception detection may increase accuracy, but are intrusive, do not offer immediate feedback, or may not be useful in all situations. Automated classification methods have been suggested as an alternative to address these issues, but few studies have tested their utility with real-world, high-stakes statements. The current paper reports preliminary results from classification of actual security police investigations collected under high stakes and proposes stages for conducting future analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationIntelligence and Security Informatics - IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, ISI 2006, Proceedings
PublisherSpringer-Verlag
Pages504-509
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)3540344780, 9783540344780
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
EventIEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, ISI 2006 - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: May 23 2006May 24 2006

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume3975 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Other

OtherIEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, ISI 2006
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period5/23/065/24/06

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Computer Science(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detecting deception in person-of-interest statements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this