TY - JOUR
T1 - Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder
AU - Weihs, Karen L.
AU - Murphy, William
AU - Abbas, Richat
AU - Chiles, Deborah
AU - England, Richard D.
AU - Ramaker, Sara
AU - Wajsbrot, Dalia B.
N1 - Funding Information:
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 2Psychiatric Associates, Overland Park, Kansas. 3Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania. 4Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut. 5Pfizer Inc, New York, New York. Funding: This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc.
Funding Information:
Medical writing support was provided by Kathleen M. Dorries, PhD, of Peloton Advantage and funded by Pfizer Inc. The authors thank the patients and family members who contributed their time to this study. Site investigators, coordinators, as well as study monitors, data managers, and data analysts were essential to the accomplishment of this trial and are appreciated by the authors. Dalia B. Wajsbrot (Pfizer Inc) served as the statistical expert for this study. Investigators who enrolled five or more patients included: Gustavo Alva, Valerie Kaplan Arnold, Ashraf Mohamed Attalla, Louise Marion Beckett-Thurman, Jesse Mack Carr, Ann Catherine Childress, Daniel F. Chueh, Ariel De Llanos, Douglas Robert Dolnak, Andro Giorgadze, Nelson Manuel Handal-Thome, Joseph Allen Kwentus, Gregory W. Mattingly, Paul Richard Miller, Marino Molina Jr., Robert Bond Molpus, Eliot Moon, William Rory Murphy, Kambiz Pahlavan, William Jeffrey Palmer, Randall Kenneth Ricardi, Robert Alan Riesenberg, Erasmo Saucedo-Uribe, Charmaine Irene Semeniuk, Jerry Carl Steiert, Ekaterina Vassilenko, Juan Luis Vazquez-Hernandez, Marianne Zdeblick Wamboldt, Karen Louise Weihs, Kashinath Gangadhara Yadalam, and Alan Soon Yeo. The sponsor was involved in the design of the study and the collection (through contracted study site investigators), analysis, and interpretation of study data. Pfizer Inc authors contributed to the writing of the report and the decision to submit the article for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© Karen L. Weihs et al. 2017; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (25-50 mg/d) compared with placebo in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: Outpatient children (7-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD and had screening and baseline Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total scores >40 were randomly assigned to 8-week treatment with placebo, desvenlafaxine (25, 35, or 50 mg/d based on baseline weight), or fluoxetine (20 mg/d). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Secondary efficacy endpoints included week 8 Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I), and response (CGI-I ≤ 2). Safety assessments included adverse events, physical and vital sign measurements, laboratory evaluations, electrocardiogram, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Results: The safety population included 339 patients (children, n = 130; adolescents, n = 209). The primary endpoint, change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, did not statistically separate from placebo, for either desvenlafaxine (adjusted mean [standard error] change, -22.6 [1.17]) or fluoxetine (-24.8 [1.17]; placebo, -23.1 [1.18]). Week 8 CGI-I response rates were significantly greater for fluoxetine (78.2%; p = 0.017) than for placebo (62.6%); desvenlafaxine (68.7%) did not differ from placebo. Other secondary outcomes were consistent with those obtained with CDRS-R. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable among treatment groups (desvenlafaxine, 60.0%; placebo, 70.5%; and fluoxetine, 64.3%). Conclusion: Desvenlafaxine did not demonstrate efficacy for treating MDD in children and adolescents in this trial. Because neither desvenlafaxine nor the reference medication, fluoxetine, demonstrated a statistically significant difference from placebo on the primary endpoint, this was considered a failed trial and no efficacy conclusions can be drawn. Desvenlafaxine 25-50 mg/d was generally safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents in this study.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (25-50 mg/d) compared with placebo in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: Outpatient children (7-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD and had screening and baseline Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total scores >40 were randomly assigned to 8-week treatment with placebo, desvenlafaxine (25, 35, or 50 mg/d based on baseline weight), or fluoxetine (20 mg/d). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Secondary efficacy endpoints included week 8 Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I), and response (CGI-I ≤ 2). Safety assessments included adverse events, physical and vital sign measurements, laboratory evaluations, electrocardiogram, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Results: The safety population included 339 patients (children, n = 130; adolescents, n = 209). The primary endpoint, change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, did not statistically separate from placebo, for either desvenlafaxine (adjusted mean [standard error] change, -22.6 [1.17]) or fluoxetine (-24.8 [1.17]; placebo, -23.1 [1.18]). Week 8 CGI-I response rates were significantly greater for fluoxetine (78.2%; p = 0.017) than for placebo (62.6%); desvenlafaxine (68.7%) did not differ from placebo. Other secondary outcomes were consistent with those obtained with CDRS-R. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable among treatment groups (desvenlafaxine, 60.0%; placebo, 70.5%; and fluoxetine, 64.3%). Conclusion: Desvenlafaxine did not demonstrate efficacy for treating MDD in children and adolescents in this trial. Because neither desvenlafaxine nor the reference medication, fluoxetine, demonstrated a statistically significant difference from placebo on the primary endpoint, this was considered a failed trial and no efficacy conclusions can be drawn. Desvenlafaxine 25-50 mg/d was generally safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents in this study.
KW - adolescents
KW - children
KW - clinical trial
KW - desvenlafaxine
KW - major depressive disorder
KW - treatment efficacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041057133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041057133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/cap.2017.0100
DO - 10.1089/cap.2017.0100
M3 - Article
C2 - 29189044
AN - SCOPUS:85041057133
SN - 1044-5463
VL - 28
SP - 36
EP - 46
JO - Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology
JF - Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology
IS - 1
ER -