TY - JOUR
T1 - Demystifying the Complexity of Aphasia Treatment
T2 - Application of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification Systemx
AU - Fridriksson, Julius
AU - Basilakos, Alexandra
AU - Boyle, Mary
AU - Cherney, Leora R.
AU - DeDe, Gayle
AU - Gordon, Jean K.
AU - Harnish, Stacy M.
AU - Hoover, Elizabeth L.
AU - Hula, William D.
AU - Pompon, Rebecca Hunting
AU - Johnson, Lorelei Phillip
AU - Kiran, Swathi
AU - Murray, Laura L.
AU - Rose, Miranda L.
AU - Obermeyer, Jessica
AU - Salis, Christos
AU - Walker, Grant M.
AU - Martin, Nadine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - A considerable body of research supports the use of behavioral communication treatment as the standard of care for aphasia. In spite of robust progress in clinical aphasiology, many questions regarding optimal care remain unanswered. One of the major challenges to progress in the field is the lack of a common framework to adequately describe individual treatments, which, if available, would allow comparisons across studies as well as improved communication among researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders. Here, we describe how aphasia treatment approaches can be systematically characterized using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS). At the core of the RTSS is a tripartite structure that focuses on targets (the behavior that is expected to change as a result of treatment), ingredients (what a clinician does to affect change in the target), and mechanism(s) of action (why a given treatment works by linking the ingredients to the target). Three separate articles in the current issue specifically describe how the RTSS can be used to describe different kinds of aphasia treatment approaches: functional approaches, cognitive-linguistic approaches, and biological approaches. It is our hope that the application of the RTSS in clinical aphasiology will improve communication in published studies, grant proposals, and in the clinical care of persons with aphasia.
AB - A considerable body of research supports the use of behavioral communication treatment as the standard of care for aphasia. In spite of robust progress in clinical aphasiology, many questions regarding optimal care remain unanswered. One of the major challenges to progress in the field is the lack of a common framework to adequately describe individual treatments, which, if available, would allow comparisons across studies as well as improved communication among researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders. Here, we describe how aphasia treatment approaches can be systematically characterized using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS). At the core of the RTSS is a tripartite structure that focuses on targets (the behavior that is expected to change as a result of treatment), ingredients (what a clinician does to affect change in the target), and mechanism(s) of action (why a given treatment works by linking the ingredients to the target). Three separate articles in the current issue specifically describe how the RTSS can be used to describe different kinds of aphasia treatment approaches: functional approaches, cognitive-linguistic approaches, and biological approaches. It is our hope that the application of the RTSS in clinical aphasiology will improve communication in published studies, grant proposals, and in the clinical care of persons with aphasia.
KW - Aphasia
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122508503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122508503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.025
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.025
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 34748758
AN - SCOPUS:85122508503
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 103
SP - 574
EP - 580
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 3
ER -