TY - GEN
T1 - Degradation assessment for machinery prognostics using Hidden Markov Models
AU - Qiu, Hai
AU - Liao, Haitao
AU - Lee, Jay
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Degradation detection and recognition of degradation pattern are crucial to the successful deployment of prognostics. A machine degradation process is known to be stochastic instead of deterministic. Recognizing the degradation pattern needs helps from stochastic and probabilistic models. Among various stochastic approaches, Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) have been proven to be very effective in modeling both dynamic and static signals [1]. In this paper, aiming to providing a guideline of how to effectively and efficiently use the HMMs to assess degradation for various machinery prognostic applications, three different approaches of applying the HMMs are reviewed and compared. It demonstrates that depending on the varieties of applications, available prior knowledge, and characteristics of degradation processes, those three implementation approaches perform differently. A full understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each deployment approach is extremely important in order to effectively utilize this powerful tool for system degradation assessment.
AB - Degradation detection and recognition of degradation pattern are crucial to the successful deployment of prognostics. A machine degradation process is known to be stochastic instead of deterministic. Recognizing the degradation pattern needs helps from stochastic and probabilistic models. Among various stochastic approaches, Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) have been proven to be very effective in modeling both dynamic and static signals [1]. In this paper, aiming to providing a guideline of how to effectively and efficiently use the HMMs to assess degradation for various machinery prognostic applications, three different approaches of applying the HMMs are reviewed and compared. It demonstrates that depending on the varieties of applications, available prior knowledge, and characteristics of degradation processes, those three implementation approaches perform differently. A full understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each deployment approach is extremely important in order to effectively utilize this powerful tool for system degradation assessment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33144484188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33144484188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/detc2005-84193
DO - 10.1115/detc2005-84193
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33144484188
SN - 0791847381
SN - 9780791847381
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - DETC2005
SP - 531
EP - 537
BT - Proc. of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conferences - DETC2005
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers
T2 - DETC2005: ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
Y2 - 24 September 2005 through 28 September 2005
ER -