TY - GEN
T1 - Defining a US architecture for environmental monitoring from space
AU - Szajnfarber, Zoe
AU - Beatty, Thomas G.
AU - Petersen, Matthew W.
AU - Vasilyeva, Anna
AU - White, D. Brent
AU - Weigel, Annalisa L.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The U.S. lacks a coherent integrated architecture, organization, and strategy for planning capabilities and investments in space-based environmental monitoring. In order to clarify the underlying problem, this paper contributes a new way to conceptualize the capability development process in terms of a two dimensional value stream - within project development and between project developments. Using this framework, the nature of the observed inconsistent service delivery - often attributed to a "gap" in the research to operations handoff - is investigated through an analysis of several historical projects. It is found that the issues are deeper than "poor coordination;" further, that programs do not progress, as expected, from research to operations. Even when the progression is expanded to separate science maturity from technology maturity, many programs experience maturity cycles as major new generations are initiated. By way of solution, four architectural alternatives are proposed and evaluated. However, until a coordinated vision for remote sensing is agreed to, taking steps to refine alter or clarify agency roles may be of limited value.
AB - The U.S. lacks a coherent integrated architecture, organization, and strategy for planning capabilities and investments in space-based environmental monitoring. In order to clarify the underlying problem, this paper contributes a new way to conceptualize the capability development process in terms of a two dimensional value stream - within project development and between project developments. Using this framework, the nature of the observed inconsistent service delivery - often attributed to a "gap" in the research to operations handoff - is investigated through an analysis of several historical projects. It is found that the issues are deeper than "poor coordination;" further, that programs do not progress, as expected, from research to operations. Even when the progression is expanded to separate science maturity from technology maturity, many programs experience maturity cycles as major new generations are initiated. By way of solution, four architectural alternatives are proposed and evaluated. However, until a coordinated vision for remote sensing is agreed to, taking steps to refine alter or clarify agency roles may be of limited value.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958522367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958522367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:77958522367
SN - 9781563479793
T3 - AIAA Space 2009 Conference and Exposition
BT - AIAA Space 2009 Conference and Exposition
T2 - AIAA Space 2009 Conference and Exposition
Y2 - 14 September 2009 through 17 September 2009
ER -