Defending conversation and responsibility: reply to Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith

Michael McKenna

doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0248-x

Defending conversation and responsibility: reply to Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith

Michael McKenna

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, I defend the central arguments of my book Conversation and Responsibility in response to two critics, Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	73-84
Number of pages	12
Journal	Philosophical Studies
Volume	171
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0248-x
State	Published - Oct 2014

Keywords

Blameworthiness
Conversation
Holding morally responsible
Meaning
Moral responsibility
Praiseworthiness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1007/s11098-013-0248-x

Cite this

@article{4feaa8ee866e459daeea2335dfd05954,

title = "Defending conversation and responsibility: reply to Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith",

abstract = "In this paper, I defend the central arguments of my book Conversation and Responsibility in response to two critics, Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith.",

keywords = "Blameworthiness, Conversation, Holding morally responsible, Meaning, Moral responsibility, Praiseworthiness",

author = "Michael McKenna",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2013, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.",

year = "2014",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1007/s11098-013-0248-x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "171",

pages = "73--84",

journal = "Philosophical Studies",

issn = "0031-8116",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defending conversation and responsibility

T2 - reply to Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith

AU - McKenna, Michael

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - In this paper, I defend the central arguments of my book Conversation and Responsibility in response to two critics, Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith.

AB - In this paper, I defend the central arguments of my book Conversation and Responsibility in response to two critics, Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith.

KW - Blameworthiness

KW - Conversation

KW - Holding morally responsible

KW - Meaning

KW - Moral responsibility

KW - Praiseworthiness

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84920139693

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84920139693#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1007/s11098-013-0248-x

DO - 10.1007/s11098-013-0248-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84920139693

SN - 0031-8116

VL - 171

SP - 73

EP - 84

JO - Philosophical Studies

JF - Philosophical Studies

IS - 1

ER -

Defending conversation and responsibility: reply to Dana Nelkin and Holly Smith

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this