TY - JOUR
T1 - Declining interest in family medicine
T2 - Perspectives of department heads and faculty
AU - Kutob, Randa M.
AU - Senf, Janet H.
AU - Campos-Outcalt, Doug
PY - 2003/7
Y1 - 2003/7
N2 - Background and Objectives: In 2003, US seniors filled 42% of family practice residency positions, the lowest percentage in the specialty's recent history. We hypothesized that institutional support, contact with family medicine faculty, and faculty satisfaction would be positively related to choice of family practice and that faculty satisfaction would be negatively affected by increasing pressure for clinical productivity. Methods: We surveyed department heads and faculty at 24 US allopathic medical schools, selected by their rate of family medicine graduates from 1997 to 1999 and the size of the school. Twelve of these schools had an increase in rates of graduates selecting family practice, and 12 showed decreases. Results: Department heads and faculty from schools with an increase in student entry into family practice residencies were significantly more likely to report financial and philosophical support from their state legislature or medical school administration. Faculty ranked patient care as most valued at their institutions, followed by teaching, research, and service. A common theme emerging from both the faculty and department head surveys was an inverse relationship between research activity and graduates choosing family practice. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of upper-level institutional support on family practice specialty choice. It also highlights a need for further examination of the specialty's relationship to research.
AB - Background and Objectives: In 2003, US seniors filled 42% of family practice residency positions, the lowest percentage in the specialty's recent history. We hypothesized that institutional support, contact with family medicine faculty, and faculty satisfaction would be positively related to choice of family practice and that faculty satisfaction would be negatively affected by increasing pressure for clinical productivity. Methods: We surveyed department heads and faculty at 24 US allopathic medical schools, selected by their rate of family medicine graduates from 1997 to 1999 and the size of the school. Twelve of these schools had an increase in rates of graduates selecting family practice, and 12 showed decreases. Results: Department heads and faculty from schools with an increase in student entry into family practice residencies were significantly more likely to report financial and philosophical support from their state legislature or medical school administration. Faculty ranked patient care as most valued at their institutions, followed by teaching, research, and service. A common theme emerging from both the faculty and department head surveys was an inverse relationship between research activity and graduates choosing family practice. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of upper-level institutional support on family practice specialty choice. It also highlights a need for further examination of the specialty's relationship to research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037587569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037587569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
C2 - 12861463
AN - SCOPUS:0037587569
SN - 0742-3225
VL - 35
SP - 504
EP - 509
JO - Family medicine
JF - Family medicine
IS - 7
ER -