TY - JOUR
T1 - Decisions under time pressure
T2 - How time constraint affects risky decision making
AU - Ordonez, Lisa D
AU - Benson, Lehman
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant to the first author from the University of Arizona Small Grants Program. We thank Lee Beach, Terry Connolly, Leamon Crooms, Barbara Mellers, Amnon Rapoport, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts. In addition, we thank Anup Kuzmiyil and Vaishali Ghiya for programming assistance. Address reprint requests to Lisa OrdoÂnÄez, Management and Policy, School of Business and Public Administration, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. E-mail: [email protected]. 121
PY - 1997/8
Y1 - 1997/8
N2 - Subjects rated the attractiveness of and judged maximum buying prices for gambles which had some probability of winning a dollar amount, otherwise winning nothing. Change-of-process theory (Mellers, Chang, Birnbaum, & Ordóñez, 1992; Mellers, Ordóñez, & Birnbaum, 1992) asserts that decision makers multiply probability and amount information when stating buying prices but add this information when reporting attractiveness ratings. When subjects were placed under time constraint, however, some subjects' ratings were consistent with a multiplicative combination process. This result only occurred when these subjects performed the rating task under time constraint and had performed the buying price task in the previous set of trials. These subjects were less likely to engage in cognitive tasks, as measured by the Need for Cognition Scale (Cacioppo, Petty, & Kao, 1984). Apparently, the extra cognitive demands of the time constraint caused these subjects to use the same strategy employed in the previous task. When the time constraint was removed, these subjects appeared to switch back to an additive strategy. These changes in information processing produced predictable patterns of preference reversals.
AB - Subjects rated the attractiveness of and judged maximum buying prices for gambles which had some probability of winning a dollar amount, otherwise winning nothing. Change-of-process theory (Mellers, Chang, Birnbaum, & Ordóñez, 1992; Mellers, Ordóñez, & Birnbaum, 1992) asserts that decision makers multiply probability and amount information when stating buying prices but add this information when reporting attractiveness ratings. When subjects were placed under time constraint, however, some subjects' ratings were consistent with a multiplicative combination process. This result only occurred when these subjects performed the rating task under time constraint and had performed the buying price task in the previous set of trials. These subjects were less likely to engage in cognitive tasks, as measured by the Need for Cognition Scale (Cacioppo, Petty, & Kao, 1984). Apparently, the extra cognitive demands of the time constraint caused these subjects to use the same strategy employed in the previous task. When the time constraint was removed, these subjects appeared to switch back to an additive strategy. These changes in information processing produced predictable patterns of preference reversals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040061576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040061576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/obhd.1997.2717
DO - 10.1006/obhd.1997.2717
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0040061576
SN - 0749-5978
VL - 71
SP - 121
EP - 140
JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
IS - 2
ER -