TY - JOUR
T1 - Current procedural terminology codes for medication therapy management in administrative data
AU - Axon, David R.
AU - Chinthammit, Chanadda
AU - Tate, Jared
AU - Taylor, Ann M.
AU - Leal, Sandra
AU - Pickering, Matthew
AU - Black, Heather
AU - Warholak, Terri
AU - Campbell, Patrick J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - BACKGROUND: Three pharmacist-specific Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes exist to facilitate medication therapy management (MTM) reimbursement (codes 99605, 99606, and 99607). However, no studies have used CPT codes in administrative claims databases to identify subjects who have received MTM services. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of MTM services provided, using CPT codes identified in an administrative dataset. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a subset of Medicare Part D individuals from the IBM MarketScan Medicare Supplemental Research Databases (2009-2015). Researchers identified beneficiaries who received MTM services using CPT codes 99605, 99606, and 99607. RESULTS: Of the 16,483,709 individuals in the dataset, only 3,291 had CPT codes indicating that they received MTM services, representing an overall prevalence of 0.020%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CPT codes as an indicator of MTM service provision resulted in far lower MTM utilization rates than in published literature. Reliance on CPT codes to identify MTM services in administrative claims is not recommended, given that it limited the researchers' ability to properly identify patient receipt of such services. More accurate methodologies are warranted for identifying MTM use and its effects on patient outcomes.
AB - BACKGROUND: Three pharmacist-specific Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes exist to facilitate medication therapy management (MTM) reimbursement (codes 99605, 99606, and 99607). However, no studies have used CPT codes in administrative claims databases to identify subjects who have received MTM services. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of MTM services provided, using CPT codes identified in an administrative dataset. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a subset of Medicare Part D individuals from the IBM MarketScan Medicare Supplemental Research Databases (2009-2015). Researchers identified beneficiaries who received MTM services using CPT codes 99605, 99606, and 99607. RESULTS: Of the 16,483,709 individuals in the dataset, only 3,291 had CPT codes indicating that they received MTM services, representing an overall prevalence of 0.020%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CPT codes as an indicator of MTM service provision resulted in far lower MTM utilization rates than in published literature. Reliance on CPT codes to identify MTM services in administrative claims is not recommended, given that it limited the researchers' ability to properly identify patient receipt of such services. More accurate methodologies are warranted for identifying MTM use and its effects on patient outcomes.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85092510763
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85092510763#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1297
DO - 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1297
M3 - Article
C2 - 32996390
AN - SCOPUS:85092510763
SN - 2376-0540
VL - 26
SP - 1297
EP - 1300
JO - Journal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy
JF - Journal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy
IS - 10
ER -