TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-situational statistically based word learning intervention for late-talking toddlers
AU - Alt, Mary
AU - Meyers, Christina
AU - Oglivie, Trianna
AU - Nicholas, Katrina
AU - Arizmendi, Genesis
N1 - Funding Information:
The work presented in this paper was partially funded by support from the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) Institutional Research Training Grants ( T32DC009398 ) from the National Institute for Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to the second and third authors and by support from the Initiative for Maximizing Student Development Program (IMSD) from the National Institutes of Health ( 2R25GM062584-12 ) for the fifth author. We would also like to acknowledge all the participants and their families who took part in the study, the members of the L4 Lab for their help with data collection, and the University of Arizona clinical faculty and staff for partnering with us on personnel and space.
Funding Information:
The work presented in this paper was partially funded by support from the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) Institutional Research Training Grants (T32DC009398) from the National Institute for Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to the second and third authors and by support from the Initiative for Maximizing Student Development Program (IMSD) from the National Institutes of Health (2R25GM062584-12) for the fifth author. The authors have no nonfinancial relationships to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - Purpose: To explore the efficacy of a word learning intervention for late-talking toddlers that is based on principles of cross-situational statistical learning. Methods: Four late-talking toddlers were individually provided with 7-10 weeks of bi-weekly word learning intervention that incorporated principles of cross-situational statistical learning. Treatment was input-based meaning that, aside from initial probes, children were not asked to produce any language during the sessions. Pre-intervention data included parent-reported measures of productive vocabulary and language samples. Data collected during intervention included production on probes, spontaneous production during treatment, and parent report of words used spontaneously at home. Data were analyzed for number of target words learned relative to control words, effect sizes, and pre-post treatment vocabulary measures. Results: All children learned more target words than control words and, on average, showed a large treatment effect size. Children made pre-post vocabulary gains, increasing their percentile scores on the MCDI, and demonstrated a rate of word learning that was faster than rates found in the literature. Conclusions: Cross-situational statistically based word learning intervention has the potential to improve vocabulary learning in late-talking toddlers. Limitations on interpretation are also discussed.Learning outcomes: Readers will describe what cross-situational learning is and how it might apply to treatment. They will identify how including lexical and contextual variability in a word learning intervention for toddlers affected treatment outcomes. They will also recognize evidence of improved rate of vocabulary learning following treatment.
AB - Purpose: To explore the efficacy of a word learning intervention for late-talking toddlers that is based on principles of cross-situational statistical learning. Methods: Four late-talking toddlers were individually provided with 7-10 weeks of bi-weekly word learning intervention that incorporated principles of cross-situational statistical learning. Treatment was input-based meaning that, aside from initial probes, children were not asked to produce any language during the sessions. Pre-intervention data included parent-reported measures of productive vocabulary and language samples. Data collected during intervention included production on probes, spontaneous production during treatment, and parent report of words used spontaneously at home. Data were analyzed for number of target words learned relative to control words, effect sizes, and pre-post treatment vocabulary measures. Results: All children learned more target words than control words and, on average, showed a large treatment effect size. Children made pre-post vocabulary gains, increasing their percentile scores on the MCDI, and demonstrated a rate of word learning that was faster than rates found in the literature. Conclusions: Cross-situational statistically based word learning intervention has the potential to improve vocabulary learning in late-talking toddlers. Limitations on interpretation are also discussed.Learning outcomes: Readers will describe what cross-situational learning is and how it might apply to treatment. They will identify how including lexical and contextual variability in a word learning intervention for toddlers affected treatment outcomes. They will also recognize evidence of improved rate of vocabulary learning following treatment.
KW - Cross-situational
KW - Late-talkers
KW - Statistical learning
KW - Toddlers
KW - Word learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920052391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920052391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.07.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.07.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 25155254
AN - SCOPUS:84920052391
SN - 0021-9924
VL - 52
SP - 207
EP - 220
JO - Journal of Communication Disorders
JF - Journal of Communication Disorders
ER -