TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical Geography as Theory and Praxis
T2 - The Community–University Imperative for Social Change
AU - Ozias, Moira
AU - Pasque, Penny
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©, © The Ohio State University.
PY - 2019/1/2
Y1 - 2019/1/2
N2 - University administrators, faculty, and staff must engage in newly fashioned community-university collaborations that better address systemic inequities and injustice during this complex time in U.S. history. Graduate students are tomorrow’s higher education leaders with the potential to fund, design, and facilitate curricular and cocurricular opportunities, including community engagement and service-learning initiatives. As such, we analyzed graduate students’ text and talk through critical discourse analysis and identified discourses—and pedagogical possibilities—that facilitated more socially just community-university collaborations. What emerged were 3 specific discourses of community-university collaboration that graduate students use: (a) discourses of volunteerism and service, (b) discourses of student outcomes, and (c) discourses of systems of power, where the first 2 discourses confirmed existing literature. Uniquely, some students shifted discourses over time. In addition, the 3rd discourse of systems of power reflected an expressed vision for social justice and included concepts of critical geography. In sum, a critical analysis of space emerged as a useful tool for building and sustaining social justice-oriented talk, understandings, and practices of community-university engagement. The current study advances new understandings about critical geography as a theoretical approach and analytical tool for community-university engagement and service learning.
AB - University administrators, faculty, and staff must engage in newly fashioned community-university collaborations that better address systemic inequities and injustice during this complex time in U.S. history. Graduate students are tomorrow’s higher education leaders with the potential to fund, design, and facilitate curricular and cocurricular opportunities, including community engagement and service-learning initiatives. As such, we analyzed graduate students’ text and talk through critical discourse analysis and identified discourses—and pedagogical possibilities—that facilitated more socially just community-university collaborations. What emerged were 3 specific discourses of community-university collaboration that graduate students use: (a) discourses of volunteerism and service, (b) discourses of student outcomes, and (c) discourses of systems of power, where the first 2 discourses confirmed existing literature. Uniquely, some students shifted discourses over time. In addition, the 3rd discourse of systems of power reflected an expressed vision for social justice and included concepts of critical geography. In sum, a critical analysis of space emerged as a useful tool for building and sustaining social justice-oriented talk, understandings, and practices of community-university engagement. The current study advances new understandings about critical geography as a theoretical approach and analytical tool for community-university engagement and service learning.
KW - Community engagement
KW - critical discourse analysis
KW - critical geography
KW - equity
KW - graduate education
KW - social justice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052070516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052070516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00221546.2018.1449082
DO - 10.1080/00221546.2018.1449082
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052070516
SN - 0022-1546
VL - 90
SP - 85
EP - 110
JO - Journal of Higher Education
JF - Journal of Higher Education
IS - 1
ER -