Credentialing: The need for a national research agenda

Joanne V. Hickey, Lynn Y. Unruh, Robin P. Newhouse, Mary Koithan, Meg Johantgen, Ronda G. Hughes, Karen B. Haller, Vicki A. Lundmark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations


A national research agenda is needed to promote inquiry into the impact of credentialing on health care outcomes for nurses, patients, and organizations. Credentialing is used here to refer to individual credentialing, such as certification for nurses, and organizational credentialing, such as American Nurses Credentialing Center Magnet recognition for health care organizations or accreditation of providers of continuing education in nursing. Although it is hypothesized that credentialing leads to a higher quality of care, more uniform practice, and better patient outcomes, the research evidence to validate these views is limited. This article proposes a conceptual model in which both credentials and standards are posited to affect outcomes in health care. Potential research questions as well as issues in research design, measurement, data collection, and analysis are discussed. Credentialing in nursing has implications for the health care professions and national policy. A growing body of independent research that clarifies the relationship of credentialing in nursing to outcomes can make important contributions to the improvement of health care quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-127
Number of pages9
JournalNursing outlook
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2014


  • Accreditation
  • Certification
  • Credentialing
  • Magnet
  • Nursing
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing


Dive into the research topics of 'Credentialing: The need for a national research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this