TY - JOUR
T1 - Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke
T2 - A multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy
AU - Levy, Robert
AU - Ruland, Sean
AU - Weinand, Martin
AU - Lowry, David
AU - Dafer, Rima
AU - Bakay, Roy
PY - 2008/4
Y1 - 2008/4
N2 - Object. In this prospective multicenter study the authors hypothesized that investigational epidural cortical stimulation (CS) delivered concurrently with rehabilitation therapy may enhance motor recovery following stroke. Methods. Patients who had suffered their index stroke ≥4 months previously were randomized into 6 weeks of rehabilitation therapy with or without CS. Cortical stimulation, targeted by functional imaging, was delivered at ∼ 50% of motor movement threshold. Primary outcome measures were Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM [a measure of neurological and motor function]) and Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT [a measure of activities of daily living]) scores. The primary study end point was 4 weeks following rehabilitation therapy. Results. A total of 24 patients, 12 per group, completed the treatment protocol. The mean interval since the patients' index stroke was 33 months (range 4-100 months). There were no deaths or cases of neurological deterioration; 1 acute postoperative seizure occurred unrelated to the device or treatment. Patients who underwent CS experienced improved hand/arm function more than control patients. The UEFM score improved 5.5 ± 4.4 points in patients in the CS group compared with 1.9 ± 4.4 points for controls (p = 0.03). A 3.5-point UEFM improvement is considered clinically meaningful. The AMAT scores for the CS group improved by 0.4 ± 0.6 points, whereas the scores in the control group improved by 0.2 ± 0.4 points (p = 0.2). A 0.21-point improvement in AMAT score is considered clinically meaningful. In the CS group, 67% of patients had clinically meaningful improvement in UEFM scores, compared with 25% of the control group (p = 0.05). Of patients in the CS group 50% had clinically meaningful improvement in UEFM as well as AMAT scores, compared with only 8% of those in the control group (p = 0.03). Conclusions. These results suggest that subthreshold epidural CS is safe and effective during rehabilitation for recovery of arm and hand function following hemiparetic stroke. Further research in a larger cohort is needed to validate the therapeutic effect.
AB - Object. In this prospective multicenter study the authors hypothesized that investigational epidural cortical stimulation (CS) delivered concurrently with rehabilitation therapy may enhance motor recovery following stroke. Methods. Patients who had suffered their index stroke ≥4 months previously were randomized into 6 weeks of rehabilitation therapy with or without CS. Cortical stimulation, targeted by functional imaging, was delivered at ∼ 50% of motor movement threshold. Primary outcome measures were Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM [a measure of neurological and motor function]) and Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT [a measure of activities of daily living]) scores. The primary study end point was 4 weeks following rehabilitation therapy. Results. A total of 24 patients, 12 per group, completed the treatment protocol. The mean interval since the patients' index stroke was 33 months (range 4-100 months). There were no deaths or cases of neurological deterioration; 1 acute postoperative seizure occurred unrelated to the device or treatment. Patients who underwent CS experienced improved hand/arm function more than control patients. The UEFM score improved 5.5 ± 4.4 points in patients in the CS group compared with 1.9 ± 4.4 points for controls (p = 0.03). A 3.5-point UEFM improvement is considered clinically meaningful. The AMAT scores for the CS group improved by 0.4 ± 0.6 points, whereas the scores in the control group improved by 0.2 ± 0.4 points (p = 0.2). A 0.21-point improvement in AMAT score is considered clinically meaningful. In the CS group, 67% of patients had clinically meaningful improvement in UEFM scores, compared with 25% of the control group (p = 0.05). Of patients in the CS group 50% had clinically meaningful improvement in UEFM as well as AMAT scores, compared with only 8% of those in the control group (p = 0.03). Conclusions. These results suggest that subthreshold epidural CS is safe and effective during rehabilitation for recovery of arm and hand function following hemiparetic stroke. Further research in a larger cohort is needed to validate the therapeutic effect.
KW - Cortical stimulation
KW - Electrical stimulation
KW - Epidural location
KW - Infarct
KW - Motor cortex
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41849130271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41849130271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0707
DO - 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0707
M3 - Article
C2 - 18377250
AN - SCOPUS:41849130271
SN - 0022-3085
VL - 108
SP - 707
EP - 714
JO - Journal of neurosurgery
JF - Journal of neurosurgery
IS - 4
ER -