Correction to: Venus Evolution Through Time: Key Science Questions, Selected Mission Concepts and Future Investigations (Space Science Reviews, (2023), 219, 7, (56), 10.1007/s11214-023-00992-w)

Thomas Widemann; Suzanne E. Smrekar; James B. Garvin; Anne Grete Straume-Lindner; Adriana C. Ocampo; Mitchell D. Schulte; Thomas Voirin; Scott Hensley; M. Darby Dyar; Jennifer L. Whitten; Daniel C. Nunes; Stephanie A. Getty; Giada N. Arney; Natasha M. Johnson; Erika Kohler; Tilman Spohn; Joseph G. O’Rourke; Colin F. Wilson; Michael J. Way; Colby Ostberg; Frances Westall; Dennis Höning; Seth Jacobson; Arnaud Salvador; Guillaume Avice; Doris Breuer; Lynn Carter; Martha S. Gilmore; Richard Ghail; Jörn Helbert; Paul Byrne; Alison R. Santos; Robert R. Herrick; Noam Izenberg; Emmanuel Marcq; Tobias Rolf; Matt Weller; Cedric Gillmann; Oleg Korablev; Lev Zelenyi; Ludmila Zasova; Dmitry Gorinov; Gaurav Seth; C. V.Narasimha Rao; Nilesh Desai

doi:10.1007/s11214-023-01022-5

Correction to: Venus Evolution Through Time: Key Science Questions, Selected Mission Concepts and Future Investigations (Space Science Reviews, (2023), 219, 7, (56), 10.1007/s11214-023-00992-w)

Thomas Widemann
, Suzanne E. Smrekar
, James B. Garvin
, Anne Grete Straume-Lindner
, Adriana C. Ocampo
, Mitchell D. Schulte
, Thomas Voirin
, Scott Hensley
, M. Darby Dyar
, Jennifer L. Whitten
, Daniel C. Nunes
, Stephanie A. Getty
, Giada N. Arney
, Natasha M. Johnson
, Erika Kohler
, Tilman Spohn
, Joseph G. O’Rourke
, Colin F. Wilson
, Michael J. Way
, Colby Ostberg

Frances Westall, Dennis Höning, Seth Jacobson, Arnaud Salvador, Guillaume Avice, Doris Breuer, Lynn Carter, Martha S. Gilmore, Richard Ghail, Jörn Helbert, Paul Byrne, Alison R. Santos, Robert R. Herrick, Noam Izenberg, Emmanuel Marcq, Tobias Rolf, Matt Weller, Cedric Gillmann, Oleg Korablev, Lev Zelenyi, Ludmila Zasova, Dmitry Gorinov, Gaurav Seth, C. V.Narasimha Rao, Nilesh Desai

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In the original publication, there has been a discrepancy between values mentioned in the text of Sect. 4.3.3 and in Table 1. The corrected version is provided here: Wrong: The gravity field harmonic coefficients up to an average degree strength of 130 (∼145 km) are generated together with corrections to the spin rate and to the pole right ascension and declination. Correct: The gravity field harmonic coefficients up to an average degree strength of 200 (∼105 km, see Table 1) are generated together with corrections to the spin rate and to the pole right ascension and declination.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	72
Journal	Space Science Reviews
Volume	219
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-023-01022-5
State	Published - Dec 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Astronomy and Astrophysics
Space and Planetary Science

Access to Document

10.1007/s11214-023-01022-5

Cite this

Widemann, T., Smrekar, S. E., Garvin, J. B., Straume-Lindner, A. G., Ocampo, A. C., Schulte, M. D., Voirin, T., Hensley, S., Dyar, M. D., Whitten, J. L., Nunes, D. C., Getty, S. A., Arney, G. N., Johnson, N. M., Kohler, E., Spohn, T., O’Rourke, J. G., Wilson, C. F., Way, M. J., ... Desai, N. (2023). Correction to: Venus Evolution Through Time: Key Science Questions, Selected Mission Concepts and Future Investigations (Space Science Reviews, (2023), 219, 7, (56), 10.1007/s11214-023-00992-w). Space Science Reviews, 219(8), Article 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-023-01022-5

Correction to: Venus Evolution Through Time: Key Science Questions, Selected Mission Concepts and Future Investigations (Space Science Reviews, (2023), 219, 7, (56), 10.1007/s11214-023-00992-w). / Widemann, Thomas; Smrekar, Suzanne E.; Garvin, James B. et al.
In: Space Science Reviews, Vol. 219, No. 8, 72, 12.2023.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Widemann, T, Smrekar, SE, Garvin, JB, Straume-Lindner, AG, Ocampo, AC, Schulte, MD, Voirin, T, Hensley, S, Dyar, MD, Whitten, JL, Nunes, DC, Getty, SA, Arney, GN, Johnson, NM, Kohler, E, Spohn, T, O’Rourke, JG, Wilson, CF, Way, MJ, Ostberg, C, Westall, F, Höning, D, Jacobson, S, Salvador, A, Avice, G, Breuer, D, Carter, L, Gilmore, MS, Ghail, R, Helbert, J, Byrne, P, Santos, AR, Herrick, RR, Izenberg, N, Marcq, E, Rolf, T, Weller, M, Gillmann, C, Korablev, O, Zelenyi, L, Zasova, L, Gorinov, D, Seth, G, Rao, CVN & Desai, N 2023, 'Correction to: Venus Evolution Through Time: Key Science Questions, Selected Mission Concepts and Future Investigations (Space Science Reviews, (2023), 219, 7, (56), 10.1007/s11214-023-00992-w)', Space Science Reviews, vol. 219, no. 8, 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-023-01022-5

@article{2c80a94cee9a47cf86ecdee7187e4f4b,

title = "Correction to: Venus Evolution Through Time: Key Science Questions, Selected Mission Concepts and Future Investigations (Space Science Reviews, (2023), 219, 7, (56), 10.1007/s11214-023-00992-w)",

abstract = "In the original publication, there has been a discrepancy between values mentioned in the text of Sect. 4.3.3 and in Table 1. The corrected version is provided here: Wrong: The gravity field harmonic coefficients up to an average degree strength of 130 (∼145 km) are generated together with corrections to the spin rate and to the pole right ascension and declination. Correct: The gravity field harmonic coefficients up to an average degree strength of 200 (∼105 km, see Table 1) are generated together with corrections to the spin rate and to the pole right ascension and declination.",

author = "Thomas Widemann and Smrekar, \{Suzanne E.\} and Garvin, \{James B.\} and Straume-Lindner, \{Anne Grete\} and Ocampo, \{Adriana C.\} and Schulte, \{Mitchell D.\} and Thomas Voirin and Scott Hensley and Dyar, \{M. Darby\} and Whitten, \{Jennifer L.\} and Nunes, \{Daniel C.\} and Getty, \{Stephanie A.\} and Arney, \{Giada N.\} and Johnson, \{Natasha M.\} and Erika Kohler and Tilman Spohn and O{\textquoteright}Rourke, \{Joseph G.\} and Wilson, \{Colin F.\} and Way, \{Michael J.\} and Colby Ostberg and Frances Westall and Dennis H{\"o}ning and Seth Jacobson and Arnaud Salvador and Guillaume Avice and Doris Breuer and Lynn Carter and Gilmore, \{Martha S.\} and Richard Ghail and J{\"o}rn Helbert and Paul Byrne and Santos, \{Alison R.\} and Herrick, \{Robert R.\} and Noam Izenberg and Emmanuel Marcq and Tobias Rolf and Matt Weller and Cedric Gillmann and Oleg Korablev and Lev Zelenyi and Ludmila Zasova and Dmitry Gorinov and Gaurav Seth and Rao, \{C. V.Narasimha\} and Nilesh Desai",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",

year = "2023",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1007/s11214-023-01022-5",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "219",

journal = "Space Science Reviews",

issn = "0038-6308",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Venus Evolution Through Time: Key Science Questions, Selected Mission Concepts and Future Investigations (Space Science Reviews, (2023), 219, 7, (56), 10.1007/s11214-023-00992-w)

AU - Widemann, Thomas

AU - Smrekar, Suzanne E.

AU - Garvin, James B.

AU - Straume-Lindner, Anne Grete

AU - Ocampo, Adriana C.

AU - Schulte, Mitchell D.

AU - Voirin, Thomas

AU - Hensley, Scott

AU - Dyar, M. Darby

AU - Whitten, Jennifer L.

AU - Nunes, Daniel C.

AU - Getty, Stephanie A.

AU - Arney, Giada N.

AU - Johnson, Natasha M.

AU - Kohler, Erika

AU - Spohn, Tilman

AU - O’Rourke, Joseph G.

AU - Wilson, Colin F.

AU - Way, Michael J.

AU - Ostberg, Colby

AU - Westall, Frances

AU - Höning, Dennis

AU - Jacobson, Seth

AU - Salvador, Arnaud

AU - Avice, Guillaume

AU - Breuer, Doris

AU - Carter, Lynn

AU - Gilmore, Martha S.

AU - Ghail, Richard

AU - Helbert, Jörn

AU - Byrne, Paul

AU - Santos, Alison R.

AU - Herrick, Robert R.

AU - Izenberg, Noam

AU - Marcq, Emmanuel

AU - Rolf, Tobias

AU - Weller, Matt

AU - Gillmann, Cedric

AU - Korablev, Oleg

AU - Zelenyi, Lev

AU - Zasova, Ludmila

AU - Gorinov, Dmitry

AU - Seth, Gaurav

AU - Rao, C. V.Narasimha

AU - Desai, Nilesh

PY - 2023/12

Y1 - 2023/12

N2 - In the original publication, there has been a discrepancy between values mentioned in the text of Sect. 4.3.3 and in Table 1. The corrected version is provided here: Wrong: The gravity field harmonic coefficients up to an average degree strength of 130 (∼145 km) are generated together with corrections to the spin rate and to the pole right ascension and declination. Correct: The gravity field harmonic coefficients up to an average degree strength of 200 (∼105 km, see Table 1) are generated together with corrections to the spin rate and to the pole right ascension and declination.

AB - In the original publication, there has been a discrepancy between values mentioned in the text of Sect. 4.3.3 and in Table 1. The corrected version is provided here: Wrong: The gravity field harmonic coefficients up to an average degree strength of 130 (∼145 km) are generated together with corrections to the spin rate and to the pole right ascension and declination. Correct: The gravity field harmonic coefficients up to an average degree strength of 200 (∼105 km, see Table 1) are generated together with corrections to the spin rate and to the pole right ascension and declination.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85175733729

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85175733729#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1007/s11214-023-01022-5

DO - 10.1007/s11214-023-01022-5

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85175733729

SN - 0038-6308

VL - 219

JO - Space Science Reviews

JF - Space Science Reviews

IS - 8

M1 - 72

ER -

Correction to: Venus Evolution Through Time: Key Science Questions, Selected Mission Concepts and Future Investigations (Space Science Reviews, (2023), 219, 7, (56), 10.1007/s11214-023-00992-w)

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this