TY - JOUR
T1 - Contamination of blood cultures during venepuncture
T2 - Fact or myth?
AU - Shahar, Eyal
AU - Wohl-Gottesman, Bat Sheva
AU - Shenkman, Louis
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - Contamination of blood cultures is believed to occur mainly during the venepuncture procedure. Consequently, meticulous preparation of the venepuncture site is widely recommended. To determine whether the contamination rate is indeed affected by the quality of the antiseptic procedure at the venepuncture site, 181 paired cultures were collected from 176 patients during a 6-month period after either strict antiseptic cleansing of skin with alcohol followed by povidone-iodine, or after brief disinfection with alcohol alone. The contamination rate was not influenced by the antiseptic procedure, and corresponded to the accepted percentage reported in most other studies. Eight false positive cultures (4.4%) were obtained after strict antisepsis of the skin and 6 (3.3%) after short simple cleansing with alcohol (P = 0.39). Our results suggest that contamination of blood cultures may not be related to the venepuncture procedure - regardless of the antiseptic technique used - but may be due to later stages of laboratory handling and processing of the specimens. Review of the literature has provided further indirect evidence to support this conclusion.
AB - Contamination of blood cultures is believed to occur mainly during the venepuncture procedure. Consequently, meticulous preparation of the venepuncture site is widely recommended. To determine whether the contamination rate is indeed affected by the quality of the antiseptic procedure at the venepuncture site, 181 paired cultures were collected from 176 patients during a 6-month period after either strict antiseptic cleansing of skin with alcohol followed by povidone-iodine, or after brief disinfection with alcohol alone. The contamination rate was not influenced by the antiseptic procedure, and corresponded to the accepted percentage reported in most other studies. Eight false positive cultures (4.4%) were obtained after strict antisepsis of the skin and 6 (3.3%) after short simple cleansing with alcohol (P = 0.39). Our results suggest that contamination of blood cultures may not be related to the venepuncture procedure - regardless of the antiseptic technique used - but may be due to later stages of laboratory handling and processing of the specimens. Review of the literature has provided further indirect evidence to support this conclusion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025666771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025666771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/pgmj.66.782.1053
DO - 10.1136/pgmj.66.782.1053
M3 - Article
C2 - 2084653
AN - SCOPUS:0025666771
SN - 0032-5473
VL - 66
SP - 1053
EP - 1058
JO - Postgraduate Medical Journal
JF - Postgraduate Medical Journal
IS - 782
ER -