Conserved noncoding sequences in the grasses

Dan Choffnes Inada, Ali Bashir, Chunghau Lee, Brian C. Thomas, Cynthia Ko, Stephen A. Goff, Michael Freeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

97 Scopus citations

Abstract

As orthologous genes from related species diverge over time, some sequences are conserved in noncoding regions. In mammals, large phylogenetic footprints, or conserved noncoding sequences (CNSs), are known to be common features of genes. Here we present the first large-scale analysis of plant genes for CNSs. We used maize and rice, maximally diverged members of the grass family of monocots. Using a local sequence alignment set to deliver only significant alignments, we found one or more CNSs in the noncoding regions of the majority of genes studied. Grass genes have dramatically fewer and much smaller CNSs than mammalian genes. Twenty-seven percent of grass gene comparisons revealed no CNSs. Genes functioning in upstream regulatory roles, such as transcription factors, are greatly enriched for CNSs relative to genes encoding enzymes or structural proteins. Further, we show that a CNS cluster in an intron of the knotted1 homeobox gene serves as a site of negative regulation. We show that CNSs in the adh1 gene do not correlate with known cis-acting sites. We discuss the potential meanings of CNSs and their value as analytical tools and evolutionary characters. We advance the idea that many CNSs function to lock-in gene regulatory decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2030-2041
Number of pages12
JournalGenome Research
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conserved noncoding sequences in the grasses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this