Abstract
Carruthers' arguments depend on a tenuous interpretation of cases from the confabulation literature. Specifically, Carruthers maintains that cases of confabulation are "subjectively indistinguishable" from cases of alleged introspection. However, in typical cases of confabulation, the self-attributions are characterized by low confidence, in contrast to cases of alleged introspection.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 144-145 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - 2009 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience