Abstract
Following the argument for the importance of comparative participant observation for approaches descendent from the conventional scientific tradition (CST), this chapter outlines how the behavioralist foundations summarized in chapter 1 translate to procedures and techniques for charting causal mechanisms in comparative ethnographic research. The chapter begins by examining the practices and techniques of the behavioralist approach in detail and describes the mode of research design, sampling, data collection, analysis, and explanation associated with this approach, giving examples from prior empirical works. The chapter then turns to longstanding concerns about ethnographic reliability and replication and explains how this approach addresses them. In doing so, it shows how behavioralist criteria align with, and diverge from, other methodological approaches to the collection, analysis, and extension of ethnographic data. The chapter concludes by explaining the contributions that can be made by repositioning participant observation within the spectrum of approaches to understanding causal processes in the social sciences.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Beyond the Case |
| Subtitle of host publication | The Logics and Practices of Comparative Ethnography |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 57-87 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780190608521 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780190608484 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2020 |
Keywords
- Behavioralism
- Causality
- Comparison
- Ethnography
- Generalization
- Positivism
- Reliability
- Replication
- Sampling
- Validity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences