TY - JOUR
T1 - Conditional mean, effective, and realizations of hydraulic conductivity fields
AU - Gao, Xu
AU - Jim Yeh, Tian Chyi
AU - Yan, E. Chuan
AU - Wang, Yu Li
AU - Hao, Yonghong
N1 - Funding Information:
The first author gratefully acknowledges financial support by China Scholarship Council (CSC, No.201606410033) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities , China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (Grant No. CUG200612) and the Laboratory Open Project Fund of Engineering Research Center of Rock-Soil Drilling & Excavation and Protection, Ministry of Education (Grant No. 202002). The third authors acknowledge the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.41172282 and No. 41672313). The corresponding author acknowledges the partially supported by the U.S. NSF grant EAR1931756.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - This study first discusses the conditional mean, realizations, and effective hydraulic conductivity in a theoretical framework. It then introduces Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) algorithms for constraining the outcome by either hydraulic conductivity (K) samples or hydraulic head (h) measurements from the hydraulic tomographic survey (HT). It demonstrates that kriging using K measurements leads to a conditional mean K field, while inverse modeling using successive linear estimator (SLE) with head measurements of HT yields the conditional effective K field. The effects of conditioning using K measurements are different from those using heads. Besides, the conditional effective K leads to the unbiased prediction of the head that honors the observed head at measurement locations. More importantly, the study reveals that the harmonic and geometric means of conditional realizations of K fields of MCS, given head measurements, are equivalent to the conditional effective K in one- and two-dimensional flows, respectively. The first-order approximation in the SLE results in a conditional covariance similar to that from MCS with smaller magnitudes. Despite the difference, all approaches predict unbiased conditional mean head behaviors.
AB - This study first discusses the conditional mean, realizations, and effective hydraulic conductivity in a theoretical framework. It then introduces Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) algorithms for constraining the outcome by either hydraulic conductivity (K) samples or hydraulic head (h) measurements from the hydraulic tomographic survey (HT). It demonstrates that kriging using K measurements leads to a conditional mean K field, while inverse modeling using successive linear estimator (SLE) with head measurements of HT yields the conditional effective K field. The effects of conditioning using K measurements are different from those using heads. Besides, the conditional effective K leads to the unbiased prediction of the head that honors the observed head at measurement locations. More importantly, the study reveals that the harmonic and geometric means of conditional realizations of K fields of MCS, given head measurements, are equivalent to the conditional effective K in one- and two-dimensional flows, respectively. The first-order approximation in the SLE results in a conditional covariance similar to that from MCS with smaller magnitudes. Despite the difference, all approaches predict unbiased conditional mean head behaviors.
KW - Conditional covariance matrix
KW - Conditional effective hydraulic conductivity
KW - Conditional hydraulic conductivity realizations
KW - Karhunen-Loeve expansion
KW - Successive linear estimator
KW - Uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094154813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094154813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125606
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125606
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094154813
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 592
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
M1 - 125606
ER -