TY - JOUR
T1 - Computer algorithms show potential for improving dermatologists' accuracy to diagnose cutaneous melanoma
T2 - Results of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration 2017
AU - International Skin Imaging Collaboration
AU - Marchetti, Michael A.
AU - Liopyris, Konstantinos
AU - Dusza, Stephen W.
AU - Codella, Noel C.F.
AU - Gutman, David A.
AU - Helba, Brian
AU - Kalloo, Aadi
AU - Halpern, Allan C.
AU - Soyer, H. Peter
AU - Curiel-Lewandrowski, Clara
AU - Caffery, Liam
AU - Malvehy, Josep
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding sources: Supported in part through the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748. Conflicts of interest: Dr Codella is an employee of IBM and an IBM stockholder. Dr Halpern is a consultant for Canfield Scientific Inc, Caliber ID, and SciBase. Dr Marchetti, Dr Liopyris, Dr Dusza, Dr Gutman, Mr Helba, and Mr Kalloo have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Background: Computer vision has promise in image-based cutaneous melanoma diagnosis but clinical utility is uncertain. Objective: To determine if computer algorithms from an international melanoma detection challenge can improve dermatologists' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used 150 dermoscopy images (50 melanomas, 50 nevi, 50 seborrheic keratoses) from the test dataset of a melanoma detection challenge, along with algorithm results from 23 teams. Eight dermatologists and 9 dermatology residents classified dermoscopic lesion images in an online reader study and provided their confidence level. Results: The top-ranked computer algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, which was higher than that of the dermatologists (0.74) and residents (0.66) (P <. 001 for all comparisons). At the dermatologists' overall sensitivity in classification of 76.0%, the algorithm had a superior specificity (85.0% vs. 72.6%, P = .001). Imputation of computer algorithm classifications into dermatologist evaluations with low confidence ratings (26.6% of evaluations) increased dermatologist sensitivity from 76.0% to 80.8% and specificity from 72.6% to 72.8%. Limitations: Artificial study setting lacking the full spectrum of skin lesions as well as clinical metadata. Conclusion: Accumulating evidence suggests that deep neural networks can classify skin images of melanoma and its benign mimickers with high accuracy and potentially improve human performance.
AB - Background: Computer vision has promise in image-based cutaneous melanoma diagnosis but clinical utility is uncertain. Objective: To determine if computer algorithms from an international melanoma detection challenge can improve dermatologists' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used 150 dermoscopy images (50 melanomas, 50 nevi, 50 seborrheic keratoses) from the test dataset of a melanoma detection challenge, along with algorithm results from 23 teams. Eight dermatologists and 9 dermatology residents classified dermoscopic lesion images in an online reader study and provided their confidence level. Results: The top-ranked computer algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, which was higher than that of the dermatologists (0.74) and residents (0.66) (P <. 001 for all comparisons). At the dermatologists' overall sensitivity in classification of 76.0%, the algorithm had a superior specificity (85.0% vs. 72.6%, P = .001). Imputation of computer algorithm classifications into dermatologist evaluations with low confidence ratings (26.6% of evaluations) increased dermatologist sensitivity from 76.0% to 80.8% and specificity from 72.6% to 72.8%. Limitations: Artificial study setting lacking the full spectrum of skin lesions as well as clinical metadata. Conclusion: Accumulating evidence suggests that deep neural networks can classify skin images of melanoma and its benign mimickers with high accuracy and potentially improve human performance.
KW - International Skin Imaging Collaboration
KW - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
KW - automated melanoma diagnosis
KW - computer algorithm
KW - computer vision
KW - deep learning
KW - dermatologist
KW - machine learning
KW - melanoma
KW - reader study
KW - skin cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077930214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077930214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 31306724
AN - SCOPUS:85077930214
SN - 0190-9622
VL - 82
SP - 622
EP - 627
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
IS - 3
ER -