Competence: What's in? What's out? Who knows?

Joshua Alexander; Ronald Mallon; Jonathan M. Weinberg

doi:10.1017/S0140525X10001652

Competence: What's in? What's out? Who knows?

Joshua Alexander, Ronald Mallon, Jonathan M. Weinberg

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Knobe's argument rests on a way of distinguishing performance errors from the competencies that delimit our cognitive architecture. We argue that other sorts of evidence than those that he appeals to are needed to illuminate the boundaries of our folk capacities in ways that would support his conclusions.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	329-330
Number of pages	2
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	33
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001652
State	Published - Aug 2010
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Physiology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X10001652

Cite this

@article{d1358d5dd85d424a913ed03d93a18cfa,

title = "Competence: What's in? What's out? Who knows?",

abstract = "Knobe's argument rests on a way of distinguishing performance errors from the competencies that delimit our cognitive architecture. We argue that other sorts of evidence than those that he appeals to are needed to illuminate the boundaries of our folk capacities in ways that would support his conclusions.",

author = "Joshua Alexander and Ronald Mallon and Weinberg, \{Jonathan M.\}",

year = "2010",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X10001652",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "33",

pages = "329--330",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competence

T2 - What's in? What's out? Who knows?

AU - Alexander, Joshua

AU - Mallon, Ronald

AU - Weinberg, Jonathan M.

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Knobe's argument rests on a way of distinguishing performance errors from the competencies that delimit our cognitive architecture. We argue that other sorts of evidence than those that he appeals to are needed to illuminate the boundaries of our folk capacities in ways that would support his conclusions.

AB - Knobe's argument rests on a way of distinguishing performance errors from the competencies that delimit our cognitive architecture. We argue that other sorts of evidence than those that he appeals to are needed to illuminate the boundaries of our folk capacities in ways that would support his conclusions.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78649964444

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649964444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X10001652

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X10001652

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:78649964444

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 33

SP - 329

EP - 330

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

IS - 4

ER -

Competence: What's in? What's out? Who knows?

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this