TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative value-based pricing of an Ebola vaccine in resource-constrained countries based on cost-effectiveness analysis
AU - Obeng-Kusi, M.
AU - Erstad, B.
AU - Roe, D. J.
AU - Abraham, I.
N1 - Funding Information:
Presently, management is focused on supportive care and infection control with other therapies being developed for EVD treatment. A multi-drug clinical trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of azithromycin, a combination of sunitinib and erlotinib, a combination of atorvastatin and irbesartan, and intravenous fluids in the management of EVD. Two monoclonal antibodies, (Inmazeb, Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY) and Ebanga (Ridgeback, Miami, FL), have been approved for treating EBOV infections. While the Ervebo (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ) vaccine has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and prequalified by WHO for protection against EBOV, the Zabdeno-Mvabea (Janssen Global Services, LLC) vaccine has been granted marketing authorization by the European Medicines Agency for individuals a year and older. EVD vaccines are currently paid for by the International Coordinating Group (ICG) on Vaccine Provision, which includes the World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, the International Federation of Red Cross, and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), and Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), with financial support from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. To ensure value for money and return on investments for such payers, it is important that an appropriate price be set for EVD vaccines to reflect their value while also rewarding innovation by manufacturers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objectives: Pricing, affordability, and access are important deliberations around infectious disease interventions. Determining a fair price that not only incentivizes development but ensures value and access for patients is critical given the increasing global health crisis. Using Ebola virus disease (EVD) as an exemplar, we aim to elucidate the estimation of a jurisdiction-specific value-based price (VBP) for a vaccine package and to consider how prices compare across selected countries that have experienced EVD outbreaks. Methods: Using a dynamic transmission model, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of a vaccine package–composed of the vaccine, storage, maintenance, and administration–for vaccination toward herd immunity in 4 countries affected with EVD (Democratic Republic of Congo, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Uganda). Based on the cost-effectiveness metrics and using willingness-to-pay thresholds equal to varying percentages of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), we demonstrated how a VBP is calculated using a cost-effectiveness-based approach. Results: The VBP for the vaccine is directly proportional to effectiveness (DALYs prevented), cost-effectiveness (ICER) and GDP per capita. Higher effectiveness, greater cost-effectiveness, and higher GDP per capita resulted in higher price ceilings compared to lower cost-effectiveness and lower GDP. Conclusion: Despite the concerns with the cost-effectiveness-based approach, we illustrated that it is an easily comprehensible method for determining the VBP of a vaccine using cost-effectiveness analysis. Choice of data, population characteristics, and disease dynamics are among the factors that need to be considered when comparisons are made across countries.
AB - Objectives: Pricing, affordability, and access are important deliberations around infectious disease interventions. Determining a fair price that not only incentivizes development but ensures value and access for patients is critical given the increasing global health crisis. Using Ebola virus disease (EVD) as an exemplar, we aim to elucidate the estimation of a jurisdiction-specific value-based price (VBP) for a vaccine package and to consider how prices compare across selected countries that have experienced EVD outbreaks. Methods: Using a dynamic transmission model, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of a vaccine package–composed of the vaccine, storage, maintenance, and administration–for vaccination toward herd immunity in 4 countries affected with EVD (Democratic Republic of Congo, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Uganda). Based on the cost-effectiveness metrics and using willingness-to-pay thresholds equal to varying percentages of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), we demonstrated how a VBP is calculated using a cost-effectiveness-based approach. Results: The VBP for the vaccine is directly proportional to effectiveness (DALYs prevented), cost-effectiveness (ICER) and GDP per capita. Higher effectiveness, greater cost-effectiveness, and higher GDP per capita resulted in higher price ceilings compared to lower cost-effectiveness and lower GDP. Conclusion: Despite the concerns with the cost-effectiveness-based approach, we illustrated that it is an easily comprehensible method for determining the VBP of a vaccine using cost-effectiveness analysis. Choice of data, population characteristics, and disease dynamics are among the factors that need to be considered when comparisons are made across countries.
KW - Ebola virus disease
KW - Value-based pricing
KW - cost-effectiveness comparison
KW - pricing
KW - value
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133494603&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133494603&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13696998.2022.2091858
DO - 10.1080/13696998.2022.2091858
M3 - Article
C2 - 35748085
AN - SCOPUS:85133494603
SN - 1369-6998
VL - 25
SP - 894
EP - 902
JO - Journal of medical economics
JF - Journal of medical economics
IS - 1
ER -