TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Removal of Poliovirus, Rotavirus SA11 and MS2 Coliphage by Point-of-Use Devices used to Treat Drinking Water and Water Disinfectants
T2 - A Review
AU - Sherchan, Samendra P.
AU - Gerba, Charles P.
AU - Abd-Elmaksoud, Sherif
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Test protocols have been developed to test water treatment devices/systems for use for treating drinking water that are used at the individual and home level to ensure the removal of waterborne viruses. Current test procedures call for the use of poliovirus type 1 and/or rotavirus SA11. Recently we suggested that selected coliphages could be used as surrogates for poliovirus for testing of point-of-use (POU) water treatment devices, however, rotavirus was not used in those studies. The purpose of this review was to compare studies of POU devices which were tested with poliovirus type 1, simian rotavirus SA11 and coliphage MS2 to determine if the behavior of rotavirus SA11 was significantly different. In addition, an attempt was made to compare the relative resistance of these viruses by various disinfectants used to treat drinking water. In all cases SA11 was removed to an equal or greater degree than poliovirus. SA11 was found to be less resistant to halogens, although one study found it to be more resistance to chloramines than poliovirus and MS2. Based on this review, use of coliphages for testing POU devices appear justified. Additionally, data on chloramines for these viruses would be useful to determine if rotavirus is more resistant than poliovirus and MS2.
AB - Test protocols have been developed to test water treatment devices/systems for use for treating drinking water that are used at the individual and home level to ensure the removal of waterborne viruses. Current test procedures call for the use of poliovirus type 1 and/or rotavirus SA11. Recently we suggested that selected coliphages could be used as surrogates for poliovirus for testing of point-of-use (POU) water treatment devices, however, rotavirus was not used in those studies. The purpose of this review was to compare studies of POU devices which were tested with poliovirus type 1, simian rotavirus SA11 and coliphage MS2 to determine if the behavior of rotavirus SA11 was significantly different. In addition, an attempt was made to compare the relative resistance of these viruses by various disinfectants used to treat drinking water. In all cases SA11 was removed to an equal or greater degree than poliovirus. SA11 was found to be less resistant to halogens, although one study found it to be more resistance to chloramines than poliovirus and MS2. Based on this review, use of coliphages for testing POU devices appear justified. Additionally, data on chloramines for these viruses would be useful to determine if rotavirus is more resistant than poliovirus and MS2.
KW - Microbiological water purifiers
KW - MS2 coliphage
KW - Point-of use water treatment
KW - Poliovirus
KW - Rotavirus SA11
KW - Testing drinking water
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201540394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201540394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12560-024-09609-z
DO - 10.1007/s12560-024-09609-z
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39160380
AN - SCOPUS:85201540394
SN - 1867-0334
VL - 16
SP - 433
EP - 437
JO - Food and Environmental Virology
JF - Food and Environmental Virology
IS - 4
ER -