TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative efficacy and safety of immunotherapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer
T2 - A Bayesian network meta-analysis
AU - Almutairi, Abdulaali R.
AU - Alkhatib, N.
AU - Martin, Jennifer
AU - Babiker, Hani M.
AU - Garland, Linda L.
AU - McBride, Ali
AU - Abraham, Ivo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Background: Two PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and one PD-L1(atezolizumab) inhibitors are approved for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer but have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Method: A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy/safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Results: In five-trials (including long-term updates) with docetaxel as common comparator there were no differences in OS and PFS between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Pembrolizumab (odds ratio(OR) = 2.22, 95%CrI = 1.28–3.70) and nivolumab (OR = 1.92, 95%CrI = 1.15–3.23) had higher ORRs than atezolizumab and at PD-L1 expression ≥50% and ≥1%. Probabilistically, pembrolizumab ranked first in OS and ORR, and in OS sub-analyses for adenocarcinoma, EGFR-mutant, ECOG-score-1, male, and age <65 years. Nivolumab ranked first in PFS, and in OS sub-analyses for squamous-cell disease, EGFR-wild-type, and ECOG-score-0. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab ranked the best option for most of adverse events. Conclusion: While pembrolizumab and nivolumab prevailed in rank in OS and ORR benefit, patient characteristics, safety and tolerance should be considered in treatment decision-making.
AB - Background: Two PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and one PD-L1(atezolizumab) inhibitors are approved for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer but have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Method: A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy/safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Results: In five-trials (including long-term updates) with docetaxel as common comparator there were no differences in OS and PFS between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Pembrolizumab (odds ratio(OR) = 2.22, 95%CrI = 1.28–3.70) and nivolumab (OR = 1.92, 95%CrI = 1.15–3.23) had higher ORRs than atezolizumab and at PD-L1 expression ≥50% and ≥1%. Probabilistically, pembrolizumab ranked first in OS and ORR, and in OS sub-analyses for adenocarcinoma, EGFR-mutant, ECOG-score-1, male, and age <65 years. Nivolumab ranked first in PFS, and in OS sub-analyses for squamous-cell disease, EGFR-wild-type, and ECOG-score-0. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab ranked the best option for most of adverse events. Conclusion: While pembrolizumab and nivolumab prevailed in rank in OS and ORR benefit, patient characteristics, safety and tolerance should be considered in treatment decision-making.
KW - Atezolizumab
KW - Immunotherapy
KW - Network meta-analysis
KW - Nivolumab
KW - Pembrolizumab
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069042094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069042094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.004
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31326706
AN - SCOPUS:85069042094
SN - 1040-8428
VL - 142
SP - 16
EP - 25
JO - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
JF - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
ER -